Dounskaia N, Ketcham C J, Stelmach G E
Motor Control Laboratory, Arizona State University, PO Box 870404, Tempe, 85287-0404, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Sep;146(1):11-25. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1144-3. Epub 2002 Jul 3.
Characteristics of control at the shoulder and elbow during nine types of drawing movements were studied in the present work. The task was to repetitively track a template, depicted on a horizontal table, with the index finger at a cyclic frequency of 1.5 Hz. The templates were a circle, four ovals and four lines of different orientations. The wrist was immobilized and the movement consisted of rotations at the shoulder and elbow joints. The studied movements varied in a wide range with respect to the amplitude of elbow and shoulder movements and relative phase between them. Kinetic analysis included analysis of torque signs, impulses, and timing. It demonstrated that the role of muscle torque in movement production was different at the two joints. During eight out of the nine movement types, the muscle torque at the shoulder accelerated and decelerated this joint and almost completely coped with the influence of the interactive torque arising from elbow motion. Conversely, interactive torque generated by shoulder motion played a dominant role in elbow acceleration and deceleration, whereas muscle torque at the elbow adjusted passive elbow movement to the various template shapes. EMG data were in agreement with the conclusions made from the kinetic analysis. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that the two joints have different functions in movement production. The shoulder creates a foundation for motion of the entire arm through the interactive torque, and the elbow serves as a fine-tuner of the end-point movement. Control of the shoulder was similar across the eight movement types and the differences in the end-point path were provided by variations in elbow control. The two joints exchanged roles during one movement type, namely, drawing the line tilted right. During this movement, the elbow musculature generated motion at this joint and the shoulder musculature counteracted mechanical influence of this motion on the shoulder position. The findings suggest that during drawing movements, the control strategy exploits intersegmental dynamics of the shoulder-elbow mechanical linkage.
本研究探讨了九种绘图动作中肩部和肘部的控制特征。任务是用食指以1.5Hz的循环频率重复跟踪水平桌面上描绘的模板。模板包括一个圆形、四个椭圆形和四条不同方向的线。手腕保持固定,动作由肩部和肘关节的旋转组成。所研究的动作在肘部和肩部运动幅度以及它们之间的相对相位方面有很大差异。动力学分析包括对扭矩符号、冲量和时间的分析。结果表明,肌肉扭矩在两个关节产生运动中的作用不同。在九种运动类型中的八种中,肩部的肌肉扭矩使该关节加速和减速,几乎完全抵消了肘部运动产生的相互作用扭矩的影响。相反,肩部运动产生的相互作用扭矩在肘部加速和减速中起主导作用,而肘部的肌肉扭矩则根据不同的模板形状调整肘部的被动运动。肌电图数据与动力学分析得出的结论一致。总体而言,这些数据支持了两个关节在运动产生中具有不同功能的假设。肩部通过相互作用扭矩为整个手臂的运动奠定基础,而肘部则作为端点运动的微调器。在八种运动类型中,肩部的控制方式相似,端点路径的差异由肘部控制的变化提供。在一种运动类型,即绘制向右倾斜的线时,两个关节交换了角色。在此运动中,肘部肌肉组织在该关节产生运动,肩部肌肉组织抵消了该运动对肩部位置的机械影响。研究结果表明,在绘图动作中,控制策略利用了肩肘机械连接的节段间动力学。