Coady Margaret
Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University of Melbourne.
J Law Med. 2002 May;9(4):449-56.
"Rights" and "interests" are key ethical concepts in the debate on the regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology. This article examines some of the ways in which these terms have been used in the debate, concentrating on their application to the situation of the potential children resulting from the technology. The article argues that, while there have been many misuses of these terms by the parties to the often acrimonious debate, nevertheless ethical regulation depends on maintaining the concepts as of central importance, but at the same time clarifying their use.
“权利”和“利益”是辅助生殖技术监管辩论中的关键伦理概念。本文探讨了这些术语在辩论中的一些使用方式，重点关注它们在该技术所产生的潜在儿童情况中的应用。文章认为，尽管在这场常常激烈的辩论中各方对这些术语存在许多误用，但伦理监管仍依赖于将这些概念维持为至关重要的，同时要明确其用法。
