• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过早期除颤使心脏骤停后的生存率提高两倍,且无需进行传统的心肺复苏培训。

Tripling survival from sudden cardiac arrest via early defibrillation without traditional education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

作者信息

Capucci Alessandro, Aschieri Daniela, Piepoli Massimo F, Bardy Gust H, Iconomu Efrosini, Arvedi Maurizio

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Gugliemo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.

出版信息

Circulation. 2002 Aug 27;106(9):1065-70. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028148.62305.69.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.0000028148.62305.69
PMID:12196330
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early defibrillation is the most important intervention affecting survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). To improve public access to early defibrillation, we established Piacenza Progetto Vita (PPV), the first system of out-of-hospital early defibrillation by first-responder volunteers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The system serves a population of 173 114 residents in the Piacenza region of Italy. Equipment for the system comprises 39 semiautomatic external biphasic defibrillators (AEDs): 12 placed in high-risk locations, 12 in lay-staffed ambulances, and 15 in police cars; 1285 lay volunteers trained in use of the AED, without traditional education in cardiac pulmonary resuscitation, responded to all cases of suspected SCA, in coordination with the Emergency Medical System (EMS). During the first 22 months, 354 SCA occurred (72+/-12 years, 73% witnessed). The PPV volunteers treated 143 SCA cases (40.4%), with an EMS call-to-arrival time of 4.8+/-1.2 minutes (versus 6.2+/-2.3 minutes for EMS, P=0.05). Overall survival rate to hospital discharge was tripled from 3.3% (7 of 211) for EMS intervention to 10.5% (15 of 143) for PPV intervention (P=0.006). The survival rate for witnessed SCA was tripled by PPV: 15.5% versus 4.3% in the EMS-treated group (P=0.002). A "shockable" rhythm was present in 23.8% (34 of 143) of the PPV patients versus 15.6% (33 of 211) of the EMS patients (P=0.055). The survival rate from shockable dysrhythmias was higher for PPV versus EMS: 44.1% (15 of 34) versus 21.2% (7 of 33), P=0.046. The neurologically intact survival rate was higher in PPV-treated versus EMS-treated patients: 8.4% (12 of 143) versus 2.4% (5 of 211), P=0.009.

CONCLUSIONS

Broad dissemination of AEDs for use by nonmedical volunteers enabled early defibrillation and tripled the survival rate for out-of-hospital SCA.

摘要

背景

早期除颤是影响心脏骤停(SCA)患者生存的最重要干预措施。为提高公众获得早期除颤的机会,我们建立了皮亚琴察生命计划(PPV),这是首个由急救志愿者进行院外早期除颤的系统。

方法与结果

该系统服务于意大利皮亚琴察地区的173114名居民。系统设备包括39台半自动体外双相除颤器(AED):12台放置在高危地点,12台配备于非专业救护人员驾驶的救护车中,15台配备于警车上;1285名未接受过传统心肺复苏培训但接受过AED使用培训的非专业志愿者,与紧急医疗系统(EMS)协作,对所有疑似SCA病例做出响应。在最初的22个月里,共发生354例SCA(年龄72±12岁,73%为目击情况)。PPV志愿者处理了143例SCA病例(40.4%),EMS呼叫到抵达时间为4.8±1.2分钟(而EMS为6.2±2.3分钟,P = 0.05)。总体出院生存率从EMS干预的3.3%(211例中的7例)提高到PPV干预的10.5%(143例中的15例)(P = 0.006)。PPV使目击SCA的生存率提高了两倍:分别为15.5%和4.3%(EMS治疗组)(P = 0.002)。PPV患者中有23.8%(143例中的34例)出现“可除颤”心律,而EMS患者中为15.6%(211例中的33例)(P = 0.055)。PPV组可除颤性心律失常的生存率高于EMS组:44.1%(34例中的15例)对21.2%(33例中的7例),P = 0.046。PPV治疗的患者神经功能完好的生存率高于EMS治疗的患者:8.4%(143例中的12例)对2.4%(211例中的5例),P = 0.009。

结论

广泛分发AED供非医疗志愿者使用可实现早期除颤,并使院外SCA的生存率提高两倍。

相似文献

1
Tripling survival from sudden cardiac arrest via early defibrillation without traditional education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.通过早期除颤使心脏骤停后的生存率提高两倍,且无需进行传统的心肺复苏培训。
Circulation. 2002 Aug 27;106(9):1065-70. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028148.62305.69.
2
Out-of-hospital early defibrillation successfully challenges sudden cardiac arrest: the Piacenza Progetto Vita project.院外早期除颤成功应对心脏骤停:皮亚琴察生命计划项目
Ital Heart J. 2002 Dec;3(12):721-5.
3
Impact of community-wide police car deployment of automated external defibrillators on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.社区范围内警车配备自动体外除颤器对院外心脏骤停患者生存率的影响。
Circulation. 2002 Aug 27;106(9):1058-64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028147.92190.a7.
4
Survival after application of automatic external defibrillators before arrival of the emergency medical system: evaluation in the resuscitation outcomes consortium population of 21 million.在紧急医疗系统到达之前应用自动体外除颤器后的存活率:2100 万复苏结果联合会人群的评估。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 20;55(16):1713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.077.
5
Community-based automated external defibrillator only resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.基于社区的自动体外除颤器仅用于院外心脏骤停患者的复苏。
Am Heart J. 2016 Feb;172:192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
6
Different defibrillation strategies in survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停存活者的不同除颤策略。
Heart. 2018 Dec;104(23):1929-1936. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312622. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
7
EMT defibrillation does not increase survival from sudden cardiac death in a two-tiered urban-suburban EMS system.在一个城乡两级急救医疗服务(EMS)系统中,急诊医疗服务(EMT)除颤并不能提高心源性猝死的生存率。
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;31(2):234-40. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70313-0.
8
Sudden cardiac arrest in intercollegiate athletes: detailed analysis and outcomes of resuscitation in nine cases.大学生运动员心搏骤停:9例复苏的详细分析及结果
Heart Rhythm. 2006 Jul;3(7):755-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.03.023. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
9
Limited response to cardiac arrest by police equipped with automated external defibrillators: lack of survival benefit in suburban and rural Indiana--the police as responder automated defibrillation evaluation (PARADE).配备自动体外除颤器的警察对心脏骤停的反应有限:印第安纳州郊区和农村缺乏生存获益——警察作为反应者自动除颤评估(PARADE)
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Apr;8(4):324-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb02109.x.
10
AED use in businesses, public facilities and homes by minimally trained first responders.经过最低限度培训的急救人员在企业、公共设施和家庭中使用自动体外除颤器。
Resuscitation. 2003 Nov;59(2):225-33. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00214-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced ECG feature extraction and SVM classification for predicting defibrillation success in OHCA.用于预测院外心脏骤停除颤成功率的高级心电图特征提取与支持向量机分类
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 16;12:1550422. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1550422. eCollection 2025.
2
Addressing Challenges of Implementing Community First Responder Models based on National and International Experiences: A Systematic Scoping Review.基于国内外经验应对实施社区第一响应者模式的挑战:一项系统综述。
Iran J Public Health. 2024 Dec;53(12):2659-2670.
3
Incidence, characteristics, and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Italy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
意大利院外心脏骤停的发病率、特征及转归:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Resusc Plus. 2022 Nov 11;12:100329. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100329. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Sport Related Sudden Death: The Importance of Primary and Secondary Prevention.运动相关猝死:一级预防和二级预防的重要性。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 11;11(16):4683. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164683.
5
Trends in maintenance status and usability of public automated external defibrillators during a 5-year on-site inspection.公共自动体外除颤器在 5 年现场检查期间的维护状况和可用性趋势。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 24;12(1):10738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14611-1.
6
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public attitudes to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and publicly accessible defibrillator use in the UK.2019冠状病毒病大流行对英国公众心肺复苏态度及公共场所自动体外除颤器使用情况的影响
Resusc Plus. 2022 Jun;10:100256. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100256. Epub 2022 May 30.
7
Blunt cardiac trauma: a narrative review.钝性心脏创伤:一篇叙述性综述。
Mediastinum. 2021 Sep 25;5:28. doi: 10.21037/med-21-19. eCollection 2021.
8
Cost-minimization analysis of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator in adult patients undergoing ICD explant procedures: Clinical and economic implications.可穿戴式心脏除颤器在接受 ICD 除颤器取出术的成年患者中的成本最小化分析:临床和经济意义。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Nov;44(11):1497-1505. doi: 10.1002/clc.23709. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
9
2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.2020年亚太心律学会/美国心律学会关于不明原因猝死死者及心脏骤停患者及其家属调查的专家共识声明
J Arrhythm. 2021 Apr 8;37(3):481-534. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12449. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Evolution of Bystander Intention to Perform Resuscitation Since Last Training: Web-Based Survey.自上次培训以来旁观者实施心肺复苏意愿的演变:基于网络的调查
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Nov 30;4(11):e24798. doi: 10.2196/24798.