Suppr超能文献

提高非裔美国男性对前列腺癌筛查困境的认识:华盛顿特区的学术-社区伙伴关系

Improving knowledge of the prostate cancer screening dilemma among African American men: an academic-community partnership in Washington, DC.

作者信息

Taylor K L, Turner R O, Davis J L, Johnson L, Schwartz M D, Kerner J, Leak C

机构信息

Cancer Control Program, Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 2233 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2001 Nov-Dec;116(6):590-8. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.6.590.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Studies have shown that African American men are at greater risk than other men for prostate cancer in terms of both incidence and mortality. At the same time, the utility of screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer remains controversial. The combination of high incidence and high mortality with the uncertain benefits of screening poses a difficult problem for African American men. This study was part of an ongoing project that sought to develop and evaluate health education materials designed to help African American men make an informed decision about prostate cancer screening. The project represented a collaboration between the Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia and the Lombardi Cancer Center of Georgetown University.

METHODS

The authors conducted eight focus groups with 44 members of the Prince Hall Masons. The focus groups covered men's understanding of prostate cancer screening and their preferences for methods of health education.

RESULTS

Participants demonstrated a high level of awareness of the availability of prostate cancer screening, a low awareness of the screening controversy, and a desire for detailed epidemiologic information and information about the benefits and limitations of screening. The preferred forms of educational materials were video and print-based materials, which the research team has recently developed.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the feasibility of developing an academic-community collaboration with the goal of improving a health-related problem in the African American community. A randomized trial is underway to evaluate the impact of the video and print education materials.

摘要

目的

研究表明,非裔美国男性在前列腺癌的发病率和死亡率方面比其他男性面临更大风险。与此同时,对无症状男性进行前列腺癌筛查的效用仍存在争议。高发病率、高死亡率以及筛查益处的不确定性给非裔美国男性带来了难题。本研究是一个正在进行的项目的一部分,该项目旨在开发和评估旨在帮助非裔美国男性就前列腺癌筛查做出明智决定的健康教育材料。该项目是哥伦比亚特区最尊贵的王子厅共济会总会与乔治敦大学隆巴迪癌症中心之间的合作。

方法

作者对王子厅共济会的44名成员进行了8个焦点小组访谈。焦点小组涵盖了男性对前列腺癌筛查的理解以及他们对健康教育方法的偏好。

结果

参与者对前列腺癌筛查的可获得性有较高认知,对筛查争议的认知较低,并且希望获得详细的流行病学信息以及有关筛查益处和局限性的信息。教育材料的首选形式是视频和印刷材料,研究团队最近已开发出这些材料。

结论

这些发现证明了开展学术 - 社区合作以改善非裔美国社区健康相关问题的可行性。一项随机试验正在进行中,以评估视频和印刷教育材料的影响。

相似文献

2
Educating African American men about the prostate cancer screening dilemma: a randomized intervention.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Nov;15(11):2179-88. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0417.
7
Development of the men's prostate awareness church training: church-based workshops for African American men.
Fam Community Health. 2013 Jul-Sep;36(3):224-35. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e318292eb40.
8
Recruitment of African Americans into prostate cancer screening.
Cancer Pract. 1998 Jan-Feb;6(1):23-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.1998006023.x.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Prostate Cancer: Community Education and Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment.
Oncologist. 2021 Jul;26(7):537-548. doi: 10.1002/onco.13749. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
Prostate Cancer-based Interventions' Efficacy on Knowledge and Adherence Intention to Healthy Lifestyle among Men.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):1129-1134. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.4.1129.
4
Understanding stress in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A focus on under-represented families.
Int J Dev Disabil. 2019;65(1):20-30. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2017.1347228. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
5
Choosing Channels, Sources, and Content for Communicating Prostate Cancer Information to Black Men: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Sep;12(5):1728-1745. doi: 10.1177/1557988318786669. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
6
Men's perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 28;12(11):e0188258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188258. eCollection 2017.
7
Cultural challenges to engaging patients in shared decision making.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jan;100(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验