Pacheco A M G, Barros L I C, Freitas M C, Reis M A, Hipólito C, Oliveira O R
CVRM-Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Environ Pollut. 2002;120(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00130-6.
There is a need to start looking into the possibility of tree bark for biomonitoring. Bark from olive trees (Olea europaea Linn.) has been collected over an area in northwestern Portugal, featuring a blend of rural lands, industrial towns and coastal environments. Samples were analysed through INAA and PIXE for their elemental contents. Results from both techniques were reconciled and then compared with an extensive database on 46 trace elements in Parmelia spp. thalli from the same sites and mostly from the very bark substrates. Distribution-free, nonparametric statistics show that, despite signal magnitude, variation patterns of bark and lichen concentrations follow one another in a most significant way. Selected elements in bark also correlate to a superior extent. As far as this investigation goes, there is no reason whatsoever for discarding bark as an alternative to lower epiphytes.
有必要开始研究将树皮用于生物监测的可能性。在葡萄牙西北部的一个区域收集了橄榄树(油橄榄)的树皮,该区域包括农村土地、工业城镇和沿海环境的混合区域。通过仪器中子活化分析(INAA)和粒子激发X射线发射分析(PIXE)对样品的元素含量进行了分析。对两种技术的结果进行了核对,然后与一个关于来自同一地点且大多来自相同树皮基质的梅衣属植物叶状体中46种微量元素的广泛数据库进行了比较。无分布的非参数统计表明,尽管信号强度不同,但树皮和地衣中元素浓度的变化模式在很大程度上相互一致。树皮中选定的元素之间也有较高的相关性。就本次调查而言,没有任何理由不将树皮作为低位附生植物的替代物。