Suppr超能文献

痛苦的关怀:关怀伦理学、抗争性女性主义与一种关怀的政治理论

Agonizing care: care ethics, agonistic feminism and a political theory of care.

作者信息

Cloyes Kristin G

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Inq. 2002 Sep;9(3):203-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2002.00147.x.

Abstract

'Care' is central to nursing theory and practice, and has been described in a variety of ways. Intense conversations about care have been developing in other fields of study as well, from the social sciences to the humanities. Care ethics has grown out of intellectual exchange between feminist thought, moral theory and the critique of traditional western political philosophy. However, care ethics is not without its critics, as these accounts of care have also sparked vigorous challenges. This paper traces the construct of care through nursing theory, care ethics, feminist critiques of moral and political theory and agonistic feminism to outline a set of problematics that a political theory of care should engage. It discusses how care is conventionally posited in more or less essentialist, universalizing and naturalizing terms. It introduces the ideas of feminist theorists who resist dichotomizing care and the political, and situate care in the context of power and politics. The tensions between care feminism and agonistic feminism are highlighted in order to explore the potential of theorizing both care and nursing in political terms.

摘要

“关怀”是护理理论与实践的核心,并且有多种描述方式。关于关怀的热烈讨论也在其他研究领域展开,从社会科学到人文科学。关怀伦理学源于女性主义思想、道德理论与对西方传统政治哲学的批判之间的思想交流。然而,关怀伦理学并非没有批评者,因为这些对关怀的论述也引发了激烈的挑战。本文通过护理理论、关怀伦理学、女性主义对道德和政治理论的批判以及竞争女性主义来追溯关怀的建构,以勾勒出一套关怀政治理论应涉及的问题。它讨论了关怀通常是如何以或多或少本质主义、普遍化和自然化的术语被设定的。它介绍了抵制将关怀与政治二分,并将关怀置于权力和政治背景中的女性主义理论家的观点。为了探讨从政治角度对关怀和护理进行理论化的潜力,文中强调了关怀女性主义与竞争女性主义之间的紧张关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验