• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童死亡审查:一项国际行动。

Child fatality review: an international movement.

作者信息

Durfee Michael, Durfee Deanne Tilton, West M Patricia

机构信息

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Child Abuse Prevention Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2002 Jun;26(6-7):619-36. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00337-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00337-x
PMID:12201158
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article discusses the multidisciplinary Child Fatality Review process in the US, Canada, and Australia, including common patterns, unique programs, changes over time, impact on multiagency systems, and future directions.

METHOD

An open-ended survey was shared with teams listed in the directories of the Los Angeles County Inter-Agency Council on Child Abuse and Neglect National Center on Child Fatality Review (ICAN-NCFR). Responses were received from 58 state and local Child Fatality Review teams.

RESULTS

Teams exist in all 50 states, Washington, DC, most Canadian provinces, and New South Wales, Australia. Team structure varies but generally includes a similar core membership, and most teams select cases from coroner/medical examiner or vital statistics records through established protocols. While most case review is conducted by local teams, state teams may review cases because of small size or sparse population or choose to review specific types of cases (e.g., Child Protective Services). State teams often support local review through training, resources, policy development, and political assistance. An increasing number of teams collect data and issue reports, often published on the internet, allowing teams to share resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Teams have matured with time, often broadening their intake spectrum, membership and data collection, and developing and following through with case management or systems change recommendations. Teams continue to improve multiagency interaction and are committed to the prevention of child injury and death. The number of teams, as well as their scope and expertise, continues to increase, developing into a national/international system.

摘要

目的

本文探讨美国、加拿大和澳大利亚多学科儿童死亡审查流程,包括常见模式、独特项目、随时间的变化、对多机构系统的影响以及未来方向。

方法

向洛杉矶县虐待与忽视儿童问题跨机构理事会儿童死亡审查国家中心(ICAN-NCFR)名录中列出的团队发放了一份开放式调查问卷。收到了来自58个州和地方儿童死亡审查团队的回复。

结果

美国50个州、华盛顿特区、加拿大大多数省份以及澳大利亚新南威尔士州均设有团队。团队结构各不相同,但通常包括类似的核心成员,大多数团队通过既定方案从验尸官/法医或人口动态统计记录中选取案例。虽然大多数案例审查由地方团队进行,但州团队可能因规模小或人口稀少而审查案例,或选择审查特定类型的案例(如儿童保护服务案例)。州团队经常通过培训、资源、政策制定和政治援助来支持地方审查。越来越多的团队收集数据并发布报告,这些报告通常在互联网上公布,以便团队共享资源。

结论

随着时间的推移,各团队不断成熟,通常会扩大受理范围、成员规模和数据收集范围,并制定并落实案例管理或系统变革建议。各团队不断改善多机构间的互动,致力于预防儿童伤害和死亡。团队的数量及其范围和专业知识不断增加,正发展成为一个国家/国际系统。

相似文献

1
Child fatality review: an international movement.儿童死亡审查:一项国际行动。
Child Abuse Negl. 2002 Jun;26(6-7):619-36. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00337-x.
2
Origins and clinical relevance of child death review teams.
JAMA. 1992 Jun 17;267(23):3172-5.
3
Can child deaths be prevented? The Arizona Child Fatality Review Program experience.儿童死亡可以预防吗?亚利桑那州儿童死亡审查项目的经验。
Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):e11. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.e11.
4
Child death review teams: a vital component of child protection.儿童死亡审查小组:儿童保护的重要组成部分。
Child Welfare. 2006 Jul-Aug;85(4):653-70.
5
Child fatality review teams.儿童死亡审查小组。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009 Apr;56(2):379-87. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2009.01.004.
6
Child fatality review teams: a content analysis of social policy.
Child Welfare. 2011;90(3):91-110.
7
Fatalities assessed by the Orange County child death review team, 1989 to 1991.1989年至1991年奥兰治县儿童死亡审查小组评估的死亡情况。
Child Abuse Negl. 1995 Jul;19(7):875-83. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(95)00043-8.
8
Child maltreatment deaths in the U.S. National Child Death Review Case Reporting System.美国国家儿童死亡审查案例报告系统中的儿童虐待致死案例。
Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Jan;38(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
9
Using capture-recapture methods to better ascertain the incidence of fatal child maltreatment.利用捕获-再捕获方法更好地确定致命儿童虐待的发生率。
Child Abuse Negl. 2010 Jun;34(6):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.11.002. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
10
Characteristics, Classification, and Prevention of Child Maltreatment Fatalities.儿童虐待致死案例的特征、分类及预防
Mil Med. 2017 Jan;182(1):e1551-e1557. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00039.

引用本文的文献

1
A descriptive study of fatal drownings among children and adolescents in the United States, with a focus on retention pond deaths, 2004-2020.2004 - 2020年美国儿童和青少年致命溺水情况的描述性研究,重点关注蓄水池死亡情况
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 15;5(1):e0004106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004106. eCollection 2025.
2
Child Death Review: Past, Present, and Future.儿童死亡审查:过去、现在与未来。
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2017 Dec;7(4):527-535. doi: 10.23907/2017.045. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
3
Procedures in child deaths in The Netherlands: a comparison with child death review.
荷兰儿童死亡案例的处理流程:与儿童死亡审查的比较
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2017;25(4):357-370. doi: 10.1007/s10389-017-0800-9. Epub 2017 May 26.
4
Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study.荷兰儿童死亡审查的实施:一项试点研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 8;16:235. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1500-9.
5
The Youth Nonfatal Violent Injury Review Panel: An Innovative Model to Inform Policy and Systems Change.青少年非致命性暴力伤害审查小组:一种为政策和系统变革提供信息的创新模式。
Public Health Rep. 2015 Nov-Dec;130(6):610-5. doi: 10.1177/003335491513000610.
6
Child mortality in the Netherlands in the past decades: an overview of external causes and the role of public health policy.过去几十年荷兰的儿童死亡率:外部原因概述及公共卫生政策的作用。
J Public Health Policy. 2014 Feb;35(1):43-59. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.41. Epub 2013 Oct 10.