Orlewska Ewa
Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Kremowa 13, 02-969 Warsaw, Poland.
Value Health. 2002 Sep-Oct;5(5):405-21. doi: 10.1046/J.1524-4733.2002.55147.x.
The aim of the study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of alternative therapeutic strategies for the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in Poland.
The model for the Polish health-care context was based on clinical data from the literature and local data on health-care resource utilization and unit costs. Costs and effects of a population of CHB patients were modeled using four scenarios, which attempt to reflect real-life practice in which patients may receive any of the treatment options available and in which a proportion of patients may still receive no treatment because therapy is not suitable. Strategies A and B assumed the availability of both treatment options: the first choice of treatment is in A, lamivudine, and in B, interferon alpha (IFN-alpha). In strategy C, the only approved treatment is IFN-alpha, and in strategy D, the patients receive no antiviral treatment. The outcome measures were HBeAg seroconversion and nonprogression to cirrhosis-the surrogate marker with predictive value for improved survival. Only direct medical costs were analyzed. The payer's perspective and time horizon of 1 year were adopted. One-way sensitivity analysis and extreme scenario analysis were performed.
The best results in terms of seroconversion and nonprogression to cirrhosis were achieved for strategy A, costs were lowest for strategy D, and strategies B and C were dominated by strategy A. The incremental cost/effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing strategy A with strategy D was 57,855 Polish new zloty (PLN) per extra seroconversion and 79,550 PLN per cirrhosis case avoided.
Cirrhosis reduces estimated life expectancy by 37.76 years and by 20 years among 30- and 50-year-olds, respectively. The ICER for strategies A and D was 2105 PLN and 3978 PLN per life-years gained for the population at ages 30 and 50, respectively, and was below the suggested threshold for cost-effectiveness, based on treatment costs for 1 year of hemodialysis in Poland (62,400 PLN). Changing the value of key drivers for sensitivity analysis did not have a significant effect on the ICER.
本研究旨在评估波兰慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)替代治疗策略的成本效益。
波兰医疗保健背景模型基于文献中的临床数据以及当地医疗保健资源利用和单位成本数据。使用四种情景对CHB患者群体的成本和效果进行建模,这些情景试图反映现实生活中的实践情况,即患者可能接受任何可用的治疗选择,并且有一部分患者可能因治疗不适用而仍未接受治疗。策略A和B假定两种治疗选择均可用:A中首选治疗药物为拉米夫定,B中为α干扰素(IFN-α)。在策略C中,唯一获批的治疗药物是IFN-α,而在策略D中,患者不接受抗病毒治疗。结局指标为HBeAg血清学转换和无肝硬化进展——这是对改善生存率具有预测价值的替代指标。仅分析直接医疗成本。采用支付方视角和1年的时间范围。进行了单向敏感性分析和极端情景分析。
就血清学转换和无肝硬化进展而言,策略A取得了最佳结果,策略D的成本最低,策略B和C被策略A所主导。将策略A与策略D进行比较,每额外一次血清学转换的增量成本/效益比(ICER)为57,855波兰新兹罗提(PLN),每避免一例肝硬化病例的ICER为79,550 PLN。
肝硬化分别使30岁和50岁人群的预期寿命缩短37.76岁和20岁。策略A和D的ICER分别为每获得一个生命年2105 PLN和3978 PLN,低于基于波兰一年血液透析治疗成本(62,400 PLN)的成本效益建议阈值。改变敏感性分析关键驱动因素的值对ICER没有显著影响。