• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量医疗服务利用的水平不公平性:方法学发展与争议的综述。

Measuring horizontal inequity in healthcare utilisation: a review of methodological developments and debates.

机构信息

School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Geriatric Medicine Research, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):171-180. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01118-2. Epub 2019 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-019-01118-2
PMID:31542840
Abstract

Equity in healthcare is an overarching goal of many healthcare systems around the world. Empirical studies of equity in healthcare utilisation primarily rely on the horizontal inequity (HI) approach which measures unequal utilisation of healthcare services by socioeconomic status (SES) for equal medical need. The HI method examines, quantifies, and explains inequity which is based on regression analysis, the concentration index, and the decomposition technique. However, this method is not beyond limitations and criticisms, and it has been subject to several methodological challenges in the past decade. This review presents a summary of the recent developments and debates on various methodological issues and their implications on the assessment of HI in healthcare utilisation. We discuss the key disputes centred on measurement scale of healthcare variables as well as the evolution of the decomposition technique. We also highlight the issues about the choice of variables as the indicator of SES in measuring inequity. This follows a discussion on the application of the longitudinal method and use of administrative data to quantify inequity. Future research could exploit the potential for health administrative data linked to social data to generate more comprehensive estimates of inequity across the healthcare continuum. This review would be helpful to guide future applied research to examine inequity in healthcare utilisation.

摘要

医疗保健中的公平性是世界上许多医疗保健系统的总体目标。对医疗保健利用公平性的实证研究主要依赖于水平不公平(HI)方法,该方法衡量了在同等医疗需求下,社会经济地位(SES)对医疗保健服务利用的不平等程度。HI 方法通过回归分析、集中指数和分解技术来检验、量化和解释不公平现象。然而,这种方法并非没有局限性和批评,在过去十年中,它已经受到了一些方法学挑战的影响。本综述总结了最近在医疗保健利用中 HI 评估的各种方法问题及其影响的研究进展和争论。我们讨论了以医疗保健变量的度量尺度为中心的关键争议,以及分解技术的演变。我们还强调了在衡量不公平程度时,SES 指标选择变量的问题。接下来讨论了纵向方法的应用和使用行政数据来量化不公平现象。未来的研究可以利用与社会数据相关联的健康行政数据的潜力,在整个医疗保健连续体中生成更全面的不公平估计。本综述将有助于指导未来的应用研究,以检验医疗保健利用中的不公平现象。

相似文献

1
Measuring horizontal inequity in healthcare utilisation: a review of methodological developments and debates.测量医疗服务利用的水平不公平性:方法学发展与争议的综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):171-180. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01118-2. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
2
Equitable health services for the young? A decomposition of income-related inequalities in young adults' utilization of health care in Northern Sweden.为年轻人提供公平的医疗服务?瑞典北部年轻人医疗保健利用方面与收入相关的不平等分解
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 18;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0520-3.
3
Is healthcare really equal for all? Assessing the horizontal and vertical equity in healthcare utilisation among older Ghanaians.医疗保健真的对所有人平等吗?评估加纳老年人医疗保健利用中的水平公平和垂直公平。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 20;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0791-3.
4
The effects of China's urban basic medical insurance schemes on the equity of health service utilisation: evidence from Shaanxi Province.中国城市基本医疗保险方案对卫生服务利用公平性的影响:来自陕西省的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Mar 9;13:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-23.
5
Horizontal inequity in the utilisation of healthcare services in Australia.澳大利亚医疗服务利用中的水平不公平现象。
Health Policy. 2020 Nov;124(11):1263-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
6
Social inequity in chiropractic utilisation - a cross-sectional study in Denmark, 2010 and 2017.社会不平等在脊椎按摩中的利用 - 丹麦 2010 年和 2017 年的横断面研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2024 Jul 15;32(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00548-x.
7
Horizontal inequity in the utilisation of Continuum of Maternal Health care Services (CMHS) in India: an investigation of ten years of National Rural Health Mission (NRHM).印度连续母婴保健服务(CMHS)利用中的水平不公平:对国家农村卫生使命(NRHM)十年的调查。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jan 15;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01602-3.
8
Equity in health service utilisation among middle-aged and elderly people with multiple chronic conditions in China: evidence from longitudinal data of 2011-2018 CHARLS.中国患有多种慢性病的中老年人健康服务利用的公平性:来自 2011-2018 年 CHARLS 纵向数据的证据。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 10;13(10):e072320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072320.
9
Inequity in healthcare use among the indigenous population living in non-remote areas of Australia.澳大利亚非偏远地区原住民人群在医疗保健使用方面的不公平现象。
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.051. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
10
Income-related inequity in healthcare utilisation among individuals with cardiovascular disease in England-accounting for vertical inequity.英国心血管疾病患者医疗利用的收入相关不公平现象——考虑垂直不公平。
Health Econ. 2013 May;22(5):533-53. doi: 10.1002/hec.2821. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
How Does the Basic Urban-Rural Medical Insurance Affect Resident Health Inequality? Evidence from China.基本城乡医疗保险如何影响居民健康不平等?来自中国的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;13(12):1455. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121455.
2
Is Public-Private Partnership a Significant Factor when Achieving Horizontal Equity in Public Healthcare Resources in Spain?公私合作伙伴关系是西班牙在实现公共医疗资源横向公平方面的一个重要因素吗?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 Sep;40(5):1093-1105. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3944. Epub 2025 May 19.
3
More or less equal? Trends in horizontal equity in mental health care utilization in Stockholm county, Sweden (2006-2022). Repeated survey-registry linked studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of patient recall for self-reported doctor visits: Is shorter recall better?患者对就诊的自我报告的准确性:回忆时间更短是否更好?
Health Econ. 2018 Nov;27(11):1684-1698. doi: 10.1002/hec.3794. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
2
Health equity monitoring for healthcare quality assurance.卫生公平性监测与医疗质量保障。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;198:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
3
Income-rich and wealth-poor? The impact of measures of socio-economic status in the analysis of the distribution of long-term care use among older people.
大致相等?瑞典斯德哥尔摩郡精神卫生保健利用的横向公平性趋势(2006 - 2022年)。重复的调查 - 登记关联研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 8;24(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02453-y.
4
Implementation of rural provider-to-provider telehealth in country Western Australia: a retrospective observational analysis via the RE-AIM framework.西澳大利亚乡村地区医疗服务提供者之间远程医疗的实施:通过RE-AIM框架进行的回顾性观察分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12335-2.
5
Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People.老年人在获得医疗和长期护理方面的社会经济不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 23;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02345-7.
6
Socioeconomic inequity in the utilization of healthcare among people with eating disorders in Australia.澳大利亚饮食失调人群在医疗保健利用方面的社会经济不平等。
Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 4;54(14):1-13. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724002290.
7
Revisiting a decade of inequality in healthcare financial burden in Cambodia, 2009-19: trends, determinants and decomposition.重新审视柬埔寨十年来医疗保健财务负担不平等状况,2009-19 年:趋势、决定因素和分解。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Sep 30;23(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02257-6.
8
Patient and caregiver characteristics associated with differential use of primary care for children and young people in the UK: a scoping review.与英国儿童和青少年对初级保健的差异化使用相关的患者和照顾者特征:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 16;14(5):e078505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078505.
9
From office to digital primary care services: analysing income-related inequalities in utilization.从办公室到数字初级保健服务:分析利用方面的与收入相关的不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Apr 30;23(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02184-6.
10
Socioeconomic and geographic variations of disabilities in India: evidence from the National Family Health Survey, 2019-21.印度残疾情况的社会经济和地理差异:来自2019 - 2021年全国家庭健康调查的证据
Int J Health Geogr. 2024 Feb 18;23(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12942-024-00363-w.
收入高但财富少?社会经济地位衡量指标对老年人长期护理使用分布分析的影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):637-646. doi: 10.1002/hec.3607. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Trends of relative and absolute socioeconomic equity in access to coronary revascularisations in 1995-2010 in Finland: a register study.1995 - 2010年芬兰冠状动脉血运重建术可及性方面的相对和绝对社会经济公平趋势:一项登记研究
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Feb 20;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0536-8.
5
Progress in the utilization of antenatal and delivery care services in Bangladesh: where does the equity gap lie?孟加拉国产前和分娩护理服务利用情况的进展:公平差距在哪里?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 29;16(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0970-4.
6
A general method for decomposing the causes of socioeconomic inequality in health.一种剖析健康领域社会经济不平等成因的通用方法。
J Health Econ. 2016 Jul;48:89-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Better access to mental health care and the failure of the Medicare principle of universality.更好的心理健康护理获取渠道和医疗保险普遍性原则的失败。
Med J Aust. 2015 Mar 2;202(4):190-4. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00330.
8
Socioeconomic inequality in hip replacement in four European countries from 2002 to 2009--area-level analysis of hospital data.2002年至2009年四个欧洲国家髋关节置换的社会经济不平等——医院数据的区域层面分析
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25 Suppl 1:21-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku220.
9
Individual Income, Area Deprivation, and Health: Do Income-Related Health Inequalities Vary by Small Area Deprivation?个人收入、地区贫困与健康:与收入相关的健康不平等是否因小区域贫困而异?
Health Econ. 2015 Nov;24(11):1523-30. doi: 10.1002/hec.3102. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
10
Has socioeconomic equity increased in somatic specialist care: a register-based cohort study from Finland in 1995-2010.1995 - 2010年芬兰基于登记册的队列研究:躯体专科护理中的社会经济公平性是否有所提高?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 24;14:430. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-430.