Suppr超能文献

同性伴侣和异性伴侣匹配模式的实证分析。

An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and opposite-sex couples.

作者信息

Jepsen Lisa K, Jepsen Christopher A

机构信息

Department of Economics, The University of Northern Iowa, CBA 0129, Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0129, USA.

出版信息

Demography. 2002 Aug;39(3):435-53. doi: 10.1353/dem.2002.0027.

Abstract

We used 1990 Census data to compare the matching behaviors of four types of cohabiting couples: same-sex male couples, same-sex female couples, opposite-sex unmarried couples, and married couples. In general, we found evidence of positive assortative mating for all traits and across all types of couples. The positive assortative mating, however, is stronger for non-labor-market traits (e.g., age, education) than for labor-market traits (e.g., hourly earnings). Further, members of married couples are more alike with respect to most characteristics than are members of opposite-sex cohabiting couples, and members of opposite-sex cohabiting couples are more alike than are members of same-sex couples.

摘要

我们使用1990年人口普查数据,比较了四类同居伴侣的匹配行为:男同性恋伴侣、女同性恋伴侣、异性未婚伴侣和已婚伴侣。总体而言,我们发现所有特征以及各类伴侣都存在正向 assortative 交配的证据。然而,非劳动力市场特征(如年龄、教育程度)的正向 assortative 交配比劳动力市场特征(如小时收入)更强。此外,已婚伴侣的成员在大多数特征上比异性同居伴侣的成员更相似,而异性同居伴侣的成员比同性伴侣的成员更相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验