Jepsen Lisa K, Jepsen Christopher A
Department of Economics, The University of Northern Iowa, CBA 0129, Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0129, USA.
Demography. 2002 Aug;39(3):435-53. doi: 10.1353/dem.2002.0027.
We used 1990 Census data to compare the matching behaviors of four types of cohabiting couples: same-sex male couples, same-sex female couples, opposite-sex unmarried couples, and married couples. In general, we found evidence of positive assortative mating for all traits and across all types of couples. The positive assortative mating, however, is stronger for non-labor-market traits (e.g., age, education) than for labor-market traits (e.g., hourly earnings). Further, members of married couples are more alike with respect to most characteristics than are members of opposite-sex cohabiting couples, and members of opposite-sex cohabiting couples are more alike than are members of same-sex couples.
我们使用1990年人口普查数据,比较了四类同居伴侣的匹配行为:男同性恋伴侣、女同性恋伴侣、异性未婚伴侣和已婚伴侣。总体而言,我们发现所有特征以及各类伴侣都存在正向 assortative 交配的证据。然而,非劳动力市场特征(如年龄、教育程度)的正向 assortative 交配比劳动力市场特征(如小时收入)更强。此外,已婚伴侣的成员在大多数特征上比异性同居伴侣的成员更相似,而异性同居伴侣的成员比同性伴侣的成员更相似。