Hall Mark A, Zheng Beiyao, Dugan Elizabeth, Camacho Fabian, Kidd Kristin E, Mishra Aneil, Balkrishnan Rajesh
Wake Forest University, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2002 Sep;59(3):293-318. doi: 10.1177/1077558702059003004.
Existing scales to measure trust in physicians have differing content and limited testing. To improve on these measures, a detailed conceptual model was constructed and a large item pool (n = 78) was generated following a detailed conceptual model and expert review. After pilot testing, the best-performing items were validated with a random national sample (n = 959) and a regional sample of HMO members (n =1,199). Various psychometric tests produced a 10-item unidimensional scale consistent with most aspects of the conceptual model. Compared with previous scales, the Wake Forest physician trust scale has a somewhat improved combination of internal consistency, variability, and discriminability. The scale is more strongly correlated with satisfaction, desire to remain with a physician, willingness to recommend to friends, and not seeking second opinions; it is less correlated with insurer trust, membership in managed care, and choice of physician. Correlations are equivalent with lack of disputes, length of relationship, and number of visits [corrected].
现有的用于衡量对医生信任度的量表内容各异且测试有限。为改进这些测量方法,构建了一个详细的概念模型,并在详细的概念模型和专家评审之后生成了一个大型项目池(n = 78)。经过预测试后,表现最佳的项目在全国随机样本(n = 959)和健康维护组织(HMO)成员的区域样本(n = 1199)中进行了验证。各种心理测量测试产生了一个与概念模型的大多数方面一致的10项单维度量表。与先前的量表相比,维克森林医生信任量表在内部一致性、变异性和可区分性方面有一定程度的改进。该量表与满意度、希望继续与医生合作、愿意向朋友推荐以及不寻求第二意见的相关性更强;与对保险公司的信任、加入管理式医疗以及医生选择的相关性较弱。其与无纠纷、医患关系时长以及就诊次数的相关性相当[已校正]。