Altiery De Jesus Vivian V, Beach Mary Catherine, Hannum Susan M, Gollust Sarah E, Nagler Rebekah, Schonberg Mara A, Boyd Cynthia, Pollack Craig Evan, Xue Qian-Li, Schoenborn Nancy L
Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Jul 17;140:109263. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109263.
Messaging about breast cancer screening cessation may reduce over-screening by raising awareness of the harms of screening, but in a background of strongly positive beliefs about screening among the public, such messaging may be perceived negatively. We aimed to assess whether older women perceived it to be ethically appropriate for clinicians to share a message that encourages breast cancer screening cessation.
As part of a large national online survey experiment with women 65+ years, we presented a message (hereafter referred to as primary message) describing the rationales for stopping breast cancer screening (e.g., guideline recommendation, harms of screening) and assessed how ethical women thought it would be for doctors to share this information with patients. We assessed open-ended reactions. We also tested two variations of the primary message with different wordings of the recommendation to consider stopping screening.
Of 683 participants, 75.9 % agreed that the primary message is ethically appropriate for doctors to share with patients., 13.2 % neither agree or disagree, and 10.9 % disagreed. Themes in open-ended responses suggested that the difference in participant response was partly attributed to whether participants perceived the message as informative or persuasive. Comparing across message variations, messages with stronger recommendations to stop screening were perceived to be less ethically appropriate than the primary message.
Most older women perceived that it was ethically appropriate for doctors to share messages aimed at reducing breast cancer over-screening with patients.
Interventions should be developed to deliver messages to reduce over-screening among older women in practice settings, with evaluations to monitor their response.
关于停止乳腺癌筛查的信息传递可能会通过提高对筛查危害的认识来减少过度筛查,但在公众对筛查持有强烈积极信念的背景下,这样的信息传递可能会被负面看待。我们旨在评估老年女性是否认为临床医生分享鼓励停止乳腺癌筛查的信息在伦理上是合适的。
作为一项针对65岁及以上女性的大型全国性在线调查实验的一部分,我们展示了一条信息(以下简称主要信息),描述了停止乳腺癌筛查的理由(例如,指南建议、筛查危害),并评估了女性认为医生与患者分享此信息在伦理上的合适程度。我们评估了开放式反应。我们还测试了主要信息的两个变体,其关于考虑停止筛查的建议措辞不同。
在683名参与者中,75.9%的人同意主要信息在伦理上适合医生与患者分享,13.2%的人既不同意也不反对,10.9%的人不同意。开放式回答中的主题表明,参与者反应的差异部分归因于参与者是否将信息视为提供信息的还是有说服力的。比较不同的信息变体,更强力建议停止筛查的信息被认为在伦理上不如主要信息合适。
大多数老年女性认为医生与患者分享旨在减少乳腺癌过度筛查的信息在伦理上是合适的。
应制定干预措施,以便在实际环境中向老年女性传递减少过度筛查的信息,并进行评估以监测她们的反应。