Study protocol for investigating racial disparities in pain care: a comprehensive integration of patient-level and provider-level mechanisms with dyadic communication processes using a mixed-methods research design.

INTRODUCTION

Although many efforts have been made to reduce racial pain disparities over decades, the pain of black patients is still undertreated. Previous work has identified a host of patient and provider factors that contribute to racial disparities in healthcare in general, and consequently, may contribute to disparities in pain care in particular. That said, there has been limited clinically meaningful progress in eliminating these disparities. This lack of progress is likely because prior research has investigated the influence of patient and provider factors in isolation, rather than examining their interaction. Successful pain care requires constructive patient-provider communication, and constructive communication is both dyadic and dynamic. One well-accepted operationalisation of such dyadic processes is behavioural coordination. We hypothesise that the pain of black patients continues to be undertreated because black patients are more likely than white patients to participate in racially discordant medical interactions (ie, seeing other-race providers) and experience disruptions in behavioural coordination. We further hypothesise that disruptions in behavioural coordination will reflect patient and provider factors identified in prior research. We propose to test these hypotheses in the planned surgical context.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Using a convergent mixed methods research design, we will collect data from at least 15 surgeons and their 150 patients (approximately equal number of black and white patients per surgeon). The data sources will include one surgeon survey, four patient surveys, video- and/or audio-recordings of preoperative consultations and medical chart reviews. The recorded preoperative consultations will be analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively to assess the magnitude and pattern of behavioural coordination between patients and surgeons. Those data will be linked to survey data and data from medical chart reviews to test our hypotheses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Virginia Commonwealth University Institutional Review Board (HM20023574). Findings will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals and speaking engagements with clinician stakeholders. We will also share the main findings from this project with patients via a newsletter on completion of the entire project.