Suppr超能文献

60岁及以下患者股骨颈头下型骨折早期与延期固定的比较。

Comparison of early and delayed fixation of subcapital hip fractures in patients sixty years of age or less.

作者信息

Jain Rina, Koo Manfred, Kreder Hans J, Schemitsch Emil H, Davey J Rod, Mahomed Nizar N

机构信息

University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Sep;84(9):1605-12. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200209000-00013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subcapital hip fractures in younger patients are generally treated with internal fixation rather than with primary hemiarthroplasty, which is generally reserved for older, low-demand patients. Avascular necrosis can occur following this injury because of disruption of the femoral head blood supply. Some believe that emergent fracture reduction is necessary to minimize the risk of avascular necrosis. The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate the functional outcomes of subcapital hip fractures in patients sixty years old or younger and (2) to compare the rates of avascular necrosis after early and delayed fracture fixation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adults in whom a subcapital hip fracture had been treated with reduction and internal fixation when they were sixty years of age or less and who had been followed clinically for a minimum of two years. The patients were divided into two groups: those treated with early fixation (within twelve hours after the injury) and those treated with delayed fixation (more than twelve hours after the injury). Functional outcomes were assessed with use of the Short Form-36 and the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index. The rates of avascular necrosis were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (average age, 46.4 years) participated in the study. Twenty-nine patients had a displaced subcapital hip fracture. Fifteen patients underwent early fracture fixation, and the remainder underwent delayed fixation. No differences in the Short Form-36 (p = 0.68) or WOMAC (p = 0.69) scores were seen between the early and delayed fixation groups. Radiographic evidence of avascular necrosis developed in six patients treated with delayed fixation, one of whom had had an undisplaced fracture preoperatively, and in no patient treated with early fixation. The difference in the rates of avascular necrosis was significant (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although delayed surgical treatment of subcapital hip fractures was associated with a higher rate of avascular necrosis, this complication did not significantly affect functional outcome. Longer follow-up is required to assess the effect of avascular necrosis on the development of arthritis and on long-term patient function. Although the results could be biased because patients were not randomly assigned to delayed or early fixation, the data suggest that urgent reduction and fracture fixation within twelve hours after a displaced subcapital hip fracture in high-demand patients may be associated with a reduced rate of radiographic signs of avascular necrosis.

摘要

背景

年轻患者的股骨颈骨折通常采用内固定治疗,而非一期半髋关节置换术,后者一般适用于年龄较大、需求较低的患者。该损伤后可能会因股骨头血供中断而发生缺血性坏死。一些人认为,急诊骨折复位对于将缺血性坏死风险降至最低是必要的。本研究的目的是:(1)调查60岁及以下患者股骨颈骨折的功能结局;(2)比较早期和延迟骨折固定后的缺血性坏死发生率。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了60岁及以下接受了骨折复位及内固定治疗的股骨颈骨折成年患者,且这些患者接受了至少两年的临床随访。患者被分为两组:早期固定组(受伤后12小时内)和延迟固定组(受伤后超过12小时)。使用简明健康状况调查量表(Short Form-36)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评估功能结局。比较两组的缺血性坏死发生率。

结果

38例患者(平均年龄46.4岁)参与了本研究。29例患者发生了移位的股骨颈骨折。15例患者接受了早期骨折固定,其余患者接受了延迟固定。早期和延迟固定组之间在简明健康状况调查量表评分(p = 0.68)或WOMAC评分(p = 0.69)方面未见差异。延迟固定治疗的6例患者出现了缺血性坏死的影像学证据,其中1例术前为无移位骨折,而早期固定治疗的患者均未出现。缺血性坏死发生率的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.03)。

结论

尽管股骨颈骨折的延迟手术治疗与较高的缺血性坏死发生率相关,但这种并发症并未显著影响功能结局。需要更长时间的随访来评估缺血性坏死对关节炎发展及患者长期功能的影响。尽管由于患者未被随机分配至延迟或早期固定组,结果可能存在偏倚,但数据表明,对于需求较高的患者,移位的股骨颈骨折后12小时内紧急复位及骨折固定可能与缺血性坏死影像学征象发生率降低相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验