Brooijmans Natasja, Sharp Kim A, Kuntz Irwin D
Graduate Program in Chemistry and Chemical Biology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0446, USA.
Proteins. 2002 Sep 1;48(4):645-53. doi: 10.1002/prot.10139.
Macromolecular interactions are crucial in numerous biologic processes, yet few general principles are available that establish firm expectations for the strength of these interactions or the expected contribution of specific forces. The simplest principle would be a monotonic increase in interactions as the size of the interface grows. The exact relationship might be linear or nonlinear depending on the nature of the forces involved. Simple "linear-free energy" relationships based on atomic properties have been well documented, for example, additivity for the interaction of small molecules with solvent, and, recently, have been explored for ligand-receptor interactions. Horton and Lewis propose such additivity based on buried surface area for protein-protein complexes. We investigated macromolecular interactions and found that the highest-affinity complexes do not fulfill this simple expectation. Instead, binding free energies of the tightest macromolecular complexes are roughly constant, independent of interface size, with the notable exception of DNA duplexes. By comparing these results to an earlier study of protein-ligand interactions we find that: (1) The maximum affinity is approximately 1.5 kcal/mol per nonhydrogen atom or 120 cal/mol A(2) of buried surface area, comparable to results of our earlier work; (2) the lack of an increase in affinity with interface size is likely due to nonthermodynamic factors, such as functional and evolutionary constraints rather than some fundamental physical limitation. The implication of these results have some importance for molecular design because they suggest that: (1) The stability of any given complex can be increased significantly if desired; (2) small molecule inhibitors of macromolecular interactions are feasible; and (3) different functional classes of protein-protein complexes exhibit differences in maximal stability, perhaps in response to differing evolutionary pressures. These results are consistent with the widespread observation that proteins have not evolved to maximize thermodynamic stability, but are only marginally stable.
大分子相互作用在众多生物学过程中至关重要,但几乎没有通用原则可用于确定这些相互作用强度的明确预期或特定作用力的预期贡献。最简单的原则可能是随着界面尺寸的增加,相互作用呈单调增加。具体关系可能是线性或非线性的,这取决于所涉及作用力的性质。基于原子性质的简单“线性自由能”关系已有充分记录,例如小分子与溶剂相互作用的加和性,最近也已用于配体 - 受体相互作用的研究。霍顿和刘易斯提出基于蛋白质 - 蛋白质复合物掩埋表面积的这种加和性。我们研究了大分子相互作用,发现最高亲和力的复合物并不符合这一简单预期。相反,最紧密的大分子复合物的结合自由能大致恒定,与界面尺寸无关,但DNA双链体是明显的例外。通过将这些结果与早期关于蛋白质 - 配体相互作用的研究进行比较,我们发现:(1)每个非氢原子的最大亲和力约为1.5千卡/摩尔或每埃²掩埋表面积120卡/摩尔,与我们早期工作的结果相当;(2)亲和力不随界面尺寸增加可能是由于非热力学因素,如功能和进化限制,而非某些基本物理限制。这些结果对分子设计具有一定重要意义,因为它们表明:(1)如果需要,任何给定复合物的稳定性都可以显著提高;(2)大分子相互作用的小分子抑制剂是可行的;(3)不同功能类别的蛋白质 - 蛋白质复合物在最大稳定性上表现出差异,这可能是对不同进化压力的响应。这些结果与广泛观察到的蛋白质并非进化到最大化热力学稳定性而是仅具有边际稳定性相一致。