Navarro Vicente
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Int J Health Serv. 2002;32(3):423-32. doi: 10.2190/6U6R-LTVN-FHU6-KCNU.
This article critiques the concepts of communitarianism and social capital as used in the United States and in Europe. For the United States, the author focuses on Robert Putnam's understanding of both concepts, showing that the apolitical analysis of the Progressive Era, of the progressive developments in Northern Italy, and of the situation of labor unions in the United States is not only insufficient but wrong. The critique also includes the difference between U.S. communitarianism and its European versions, Christian democracy and New Labour, and the limitations of both approaches. The uses and misuses of these concepts in the political debate are discussed.
本文对美国和欧洲使用的社群主义和社会资本概念进行了批判。对于美国,作者重点关注罗伯特·普特南对这两个概念的理解,表明对进步时代、意大利北部的进步发展以及美国工会状况的非政治分析不仅不充分而且错误。该批判还包括美国社群主义与其欧洲版本(基督教民主主义和新工党)之间的差异,以及这两种方法的局限性。文中讨论了这些概念在政治辩论中的使用和误用情况。