Ponto Laura L Boles, Kathol Roger G, Kettelkamp Richard, Watkins G Leonard, Richmond John C W, Clark Jo, Hichwa Richard D
Department of Radiology, PET Imaging Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242, USA.
J Anxiety Disord. 2002;16(3):247-58. doi: 10.1016/s0887-6185(02)00094-4.
To determine the effect of CO2 inhalation on global cerebral blood flow (gCBF) and pCO2-adjusted gCBF in normal subjects and panic disorder patients.
Global cerebral blood flow was determined using quantitative [15O] water imaging in normal subjects (n = 12) and panic disorder patients (n = 14) after inhalations of medical grade air and of 35%/65% CO2/O2 mixture, a known inducer of panic. The gCBF was calculated as an area-weighted mean value. The pCO2 -adjusted gCBF values were calculated based on the formula of Reiman et al. [Am. J. Psychiatr. 143 (1986) 469]. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and regression analyses.
The pCO2 values did not differ statistically between normals and panic patients. Panic patients exhibited a decrease in gCBF and stable pCO2-adjusted gCBF values in comparisons of AIR and CO2 inhalations, whereas normals exhibited stable gCBF and increasing pCO2-adjusted gCBF values.
Patients with panic disorder, especially when symptomatic, exhibited an abnormal pattern in gCBF response to provocation.
确定吸入二氧化碳对正常受试者和惊恐障碍患者的全脑血流量(gCBF)以及经二氧化碳分压(pCO2)调整后的gCBF的影响。
在正常受试者(n = 12)和惊恐障碍患者(n = 14)吸入医用级空气以及35%/65%二氧化碳/氧气混合物(一种已知的惊恐诱发剂)后,使用定量[15O]水成像技术测定全脑血流量。gCBF计算为面积加权平均值。经pCO2调整后的gCBF值根据雷曼等人的公式计算[《美国精神病学杂志》143(1986)469]。数据采用重复测量方差分析和回归分析进行分析。
正常人和惊恐障碍患者之间的pCO2值在统计学上无差异。在比较吸入空气和吸入二氧化碳时,惊恐障碍患者的gCBF降低,经pCO2调整后的gCBF值稳定,而正常受试者的gCBF稳定,经pCO2调整后的gCBF值增加。
惊恐障碍患者,尤其是有症状时,在对激发刺激的gCBF反应中表现出异常模式。