Suppr超能文献

二氧化碳和过度通气对惊恐障碍患者的致焦虑作用。

Anxiogenic effects of CO2 and hyperventilation in patients with panic disorder.

作者信息

Gorman J M, Papp L A, Coplan J D, Martinez J M, Lennon S, Goetz R R, Ross D, Klein D F

机构信息

Biological Studies Unit, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Apr;151(4):547-53. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.4.547.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have indicated that patients with panic disorder are more likely than normal subjects to have acute panic attacks during inhalation of CO2, but methodological objections have been raised. In this study the authors attempted to address three of these methodological problems by ensuring that raters who assessed whether panic attacks occurred were blind to subjects' diagnoses, by randomizing the order of administration of 5% CO2 and hyperventilation, and by challenging a greater number of subjects with 7% CO2.

METHOD

Patients with panic disorder and normal subjects underwent 20-minute inhalations of 5% CO2 and 7% CO2 and 15 minutes of room-air hyperventilation. Ratings of panic/no panic during each condition were made separately by an assessor blind to diagnosis and by the subject. Scores on four panic rating scales were also recorded before and after each intervention.

RESULTS

Room-air hyperventilation caused panic attacks in a small number of patients; the difference in panic rate between patients and comparison subjects was statistically significant by the subjects' but not by the raters' assessment. Panic rates during 5% CO2 and 7% CO2 were significantly greater among the patients by both assessments; the panic rate was greatest during 7% CO2. Order of administration did not significantly affect panic rates for hyperventilation and 5% CO2.

CONCLUSIONS

Panic patients were clearly more sensitive to the anxiogenic effects of CO2 than comparison subjects, and CO2 was a more potent anxiogenic stimulus than room-air hyperventilation. Seven percent CO2 discriminated best between patients and comparison subjects and should be the focus of further research.

摘要

目的

以往研究表明,惊恐障碍患者在吸入二氧化碳时比正常受试者更易出现急性惊恐发作,但也有人对此提出了方法学上的质疑。在本研究中,作者试图解决其中三个方法学问题,即确保评估惊恐发作是否发生的评估者对受试者的诊断不知情,对5%二氧化碳和过度通气的给药顺序进行随机化,并对更多受试者使用7%二氧化碳进行激发试验。

方法

惊恐障碍患者和正常受试者分别接受20分钟的5%二氧化碳和7%二氧化碳吸入以及15分钟的室内空气过度通气。在每种情况下,由一名对诊断不知情的评估者和受试者分别对惊恐/无惊恐进行评分。在每次干预前后还记录了四个惊恐评定量表的得分。

结果

室内空气过度通气在少数患者中引发了惊恐发作;患者与对照受试者之间的惊恐发作率差异,根据受试者的评估具有统计学意义,但根据评估者的评估则无统计学意义。在两种评估中,患者在吸入5%二氧化碳和7%二氧化碳期间的惊恐发作率均显著更高;在吸入7%二氧化碳期间惊恐发作率最高。给药顺序对过度通气和5%二氧化碳的惊恐发作率没有显著影响。

结论

惊恐障碍患者对二氧化碳的致焦虑作用明显比对受试者更敏感,并且二氧化碳是比室内空气过度通气更强效的致焦虑刺激物。7%的二氧化碳在区分患者和对照受试者方面效果最佳,应成为进一步研究的重点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验