• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

香港长者长期护理政策。

Long-term care policy for elders in Hong Kong.

作者信息

Chi I

机构信息

Centre on Aging, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;13(2-3):137-53. doi: 10.1300/j031v13n02_10.

DOI:10.1300/j031v13n02_10
PMID:12216352
Abstract

The context in which aged care policy is being developed in Hong Kong is characterized not only by rapid demographic aging and social change, but also by new political and administrative systems being built on a colonial legacy. This article begins with a description of the demographic profile and trends in population aging, noting particular differences in marriage and family formation that differentiate Hong Kong from other developed countries and that also show marked changes between generations. While past social policies can be credited with contributing to the achievement of high life expectancy in Hong Kong, these policies were unevenly developed, with little provision for income security in old age or for long-term care. Both issues have come to the fore in policy development in recent years, culminating in the formation of the Elderly Commission in 1997 and revitalizing the level of attention given to developing community care. A clear policy agenda has been drawn up to promote the development of a long-term care system, addressing issues of integration; role differentiation for assessment and service provision, including new contractual arrangements; quality assurance; and financing. The political and administrative changes are seen to present opportunities for containing residential care and forging a care system founded on community services.

摘要

香港老年护理政策制定的背景不仅具有人口快速老龄化和社会变革的特点,还体现在基于殖民遗产构建的新政治和行政体系上。本文首先描述了人口结构概况和人口老龄化趋势,指出婚姻和家庭构成方面的特殊差异,这些差异使香港有别于其他发达国家,且在代际之间也呈现出显著变化。虽然过去的社会政策有助于香港实现较高的预期寿命,但这些政策发展不均衡,老年收入保障和长期护理方面的保障措施很少。近年来,这两个问题在政策制定中变得突出,最终在1997年成立了老年事务委员会,并重新激发了对发展社区护理的关注程度。已经制定了明确的政策议程,以促进长期护理体系的发展,解决整合问题;评估和服务提供的角色分化,包括新的合同安排;质量保证;以及融资。政治和行政变革被视为控制机构护理并建立基于社区服务的护理体系的机遇。

相似文献

1
Long-term care policy for elders in Hong Kong.香港长者长期护理政策。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;13(2-3):137-53. doi: 10.1300/j031v13n02_10.
2
Long-term care policy in Hong Kong: challenges and future directions.香港的长期护理政策:挑战与未来方向。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2011 Jul;30(3):119-32. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2011.592413.
3
A proposal for a voucher system for long-term care in Hong Kong.关于香港长期护理券制度的一项提议。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2005;17(2):85-106. doi: 10.1300/J031v17n02_06.
4
The Politics of Aging under a Hybrid Regime: The Case of Democratization in Hong Kong.混合政体下的老龄化政治:以香港的民主化为例。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2021 Jan-Feb;33(1):82-100. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1685348. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
5
Changing needs and changing service delivery for long-term care in Hong Kong.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;13(2-3):155-68. doi: 10.1300/j031v13n02_11.
6
Organization and delivery of long-term care in Singapore: present issues and future challenges.新加坡长期护理的组织与提供:当前问题与未来挑战
J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;13(2-3):185-201. doi: 10.1300/j031v13n02_13.
7
Hong Kong domestic health spending: financial years 1989/90 to 2008/09.香港本地健康开支:1989/90 财政年度至 2008/09 财政年度。
Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Aug;18(4 Suppl 4):1-23.
8
Devolution and aging policy: racing to the bottom in long-term care.权力下放与老龄化政策:长期护理领域的逐底竞争。
Int J Health Serv. 1997;27(3):427-42. doi: 10.2190/EPYW-5C8C-F53Y-C1JL.
9
Long-term care in China: issues and prospects.中国的长期护理:问题与前景。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2012;55(7):570-86. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2011.650319.
10
An exploration of older Hong Kong residents' willingness to make copayments toward vouchers for community care.探讨香港老年居民对社区护理代金券自付费用意愿。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2019 Jul-Sep;31(4):358-377. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1467157. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Can formal home and community-based care substitute informal care? Evidence from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.正式的家庭和社区护理能否替代非正式护理?来自中国健康长寿纵向研究的证据。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05312-7.
2
Experience of a demand-side subsidy scheme for residential long-term care: perspectives of elderly and their carers.需求方补贴计划在居家长期护理中的经验:老年人及其照护者的观点。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 7;23(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03692-2.
3
Can vouchers make a difference to the use of private primary care services by older people? Experience from the healthcare reform programme in Hong Kong.
代金券能否改变老年人对私人初级保健服务的利用?来自香港医疗改革计划的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 7;11:255. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-255.