Suppr超能文献

正式的家庭和社区护理能否替代非正式护理?来自中国健康长寿纵向研究的证据。

Can formal home and community-based care substitute informal care? Evidence from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.

机构信息

School of Ethnology and Sociology, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China.

Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05312-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Formal home and community-based care are often considered as the preferable option to institutional care, offering older individuals the convenience of receiving care in their homes. Although research has found that these services may alleviate the burden on informal caregivers, there is a lack of research on which specific types of formal home and community-based care influence informal care provision.

METHODS

Employing fixed-effects and quantile regression models, this study seeks to explore the effects that various formal home and community-based care services have on reducing the burden of informal care. This study draws data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey 2005, 2008, 2011, 2014, and 2018.

RESULTS

Our findings indicate that two types of formal care substantially influence the provision of informal care. The availability of daily living assistance services correlates with reduced informal caregiving hours, especially for those with extensive care needs. The availability of community-based health care services is linked to a reduction in the direct expenses incurred from informal caregiving, especially for those incurring greater direct caregiving costs. These effects are more prominent among urban residents. Other services, such as mental health support and legal advice services, do not demonstrate significant effects on reducing informal care hours and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily living assistance and community-based health care services play a crucial role in benefiting informal caregivers. It is important to prioritize the expansion of these services, especially among those with greater care needs.

摘要

背景

家庭和社区的正式护理通常被认为是机构护理的首选,为老年人提供了在家中接受护理的便利。尽管研究发现这些服务可以减轻非正式照顾者的负担,但对于哪种特定类型的家庭和社区正式护理会影响非正式护理提供,研究还很缺乏。

方法

本研究采用固定效应和分位数回归模型,探讨了各种家庭和社区正式护理服务对减轻非正式护理负担的影响。本研究的数据来自中国健康长寿追踪调查 2005、2008、2011、2014 和 2018 年的数据。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,有两种类型的正式护理对非正式护理的提供有显著影响。日常生活援助服务的提供与非正式护理时间的减少有关,特别是对那些有广泛护理需求的人。社区卫生保健服务的提供与非正式护理直接费用的减少有关,特别是对那些直接护理成本较高的人。这些影响在城市居民中更为明显。其他服务,如心理健康支持和法律咨询服务,对减少非正式护理时间和成本没有显著影响。

结论

日常生活援助和社区卫生保健服务对非正式照顾者有重要的益处。优先扩大这些服务非常重要,特别是对那些有更大护理需求的人。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验