Jull Gwendolen, Trott Patricia, Potter Helen, Zito Guy, Niere Ken, Shirley Debra, Emberson Jonathan, Marschner Ian, Richardson Carolyn
Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Sep 1;27(17):1835-43; discussion 1843. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209010-00004.
A multicenter, randomized controlled trial with unblinded treatment and blinded outcome assessment was conducted. The treatment period was 6 weeks with follow-up assessment after treatment, then at 3, 6, and 12 months.
To determine the effectiveness of manipulative therapy and a low-load exercise program for cervicogenic headache when used alone and in combination, as compared with a control group.
Headaches arising from cervical musculoskeletal disorders are common. Conservative therapies are recommended as the first treatment of choice. Evidence for the effectiveness of manipulative therapy is inconclusive and available only for the short term. There is no evidence for exercise, and no study has investigated the effect of combined therapies for cervicogenic headache.
In this study, 200 participants who met the diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache were randomized into four groups: manipulative therapy group, exercise therapy group, combined therapy group, and a control group. The primary outcome was a change in headache frequency. Other outcomes included changes in headache intensity and duration, the Northwick Park Neck Pain Index, medication intake, and patient satisfaction. Physical outcomes included pain on neck movement, upper cervical joint tenderness, a craniocervical flexion muscle test, and a photographic measure of posture.
There were no differences in headache-related and demographic characteristics between the groups at baseline. The loss to follow-up evaluation was 3.5%. At the 12-month follow-up assessment, both manipulative therapy and specific exercise had significantly reduced headache frequency and intensity, and the neck pain and effects were maintained (P < 0.05 for all). The combined therapies was not significantly superior to either therapy alone, but 10% more patients gained relief with the combination. Effect sizes were at least moderate and clinically relevant.
Manipulative therapy and exercise can reduce the symptoms of cervicogenic headache, and the effects are maintained.
开展了一项多中心、随机对照试验,治疗不设盲,结果评估设盲。治疗期为6周,治疗后进行随访评估,随后在3个月、6个月和12个月时再次评估。
确定手法治疗和低负荷运动方案单独使用及联合使用时,与对照组相比,对颈源性头痛的疗效。
由颈部肌肉骨骼疾病引起的头痛很常见。推荐保守治疗作为首选的初始治疗方法。手法治疗有效性的证据尚无定论,且仅适用于短期。尚无运动疗法有效性的证据,也没有研究调查联合疗法对颈源性头痛的影响。
在本研究中,200名符合颈源性头痛诊断标准的参与者被随机分为四组:手法治疗组、运动治疗组、联合治疗组和对照组。主要结局是头痛频率的变化。其他结局包括头痛强度和持续时间的变化、诺斯威克公园颈部疼痛指数、药物摄入量和患者满意度。身体指标包括颈部活动时的疼痛、上颈椎关节压痛、颅颈屈曲肌测试和姿势的影像学测量。
各组在基线时的头痛相关特征和人口统计学特征无差异。失访率为3.5%。在12个月的随访评估中,手法治疗和特定运动均显著降低了头痛频率和强度,颈部疼痛及效果得以维持(所有P<0.05)。联合疗法并不显著优于单独的任何一种疗法,但联合治疗使缓解的患者多了10%。效应量至少为中等且具有临床相关性。
手法治疗和运动可减轻颈源性头痛的症状,且效果得以维持。