Suppr超能文献

颈椎侧屈旋转试验对C1/2功能障碍的诊断效度。

The diagnostic validity of the cervical side bend-rotation test for C 1/2 dysfunction.

作者信息

Swanson Brian T, Learman Kenneth E, Petersen Shannon M, O'Halloran Bryan

机构信息

Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, USA.

Graduate Studies in Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2025 Apr;33(2):133-141. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2430506. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Neck pain and headaches are common, with a reported lifetime prevalence of up to 66%. Upper cervical segmental dysfunction has been implicated as meaningful in neck pain and multiple headache types. Several tests have been described to assess upper cervical joint dysfunction, including the flexion-rotation test (FRT), the side bend-rotation test (SBRT), and joint play assessment (PA). The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic validity of the SBRT to detect C1-2 dysfunction in a sample of people with medically diagnosed sinus headaches and controls.

METHODS

Design: prospective diagnostic accuracy study, occurring during an observational case-control study in a sample of individuals with medically diagnosed sinus headaches. All participants were assessed using the SBRT, FRT, and C1-2 joint play assessments. The diagnostic accuracy of the SBRT was assessed using a reference standard of concurrent positive FRT (a loss of at least 10° from expected ROM (≤34°)) and restriction of C1-2 joint play. Cut-off scores for the SBRT were determined using ROC curve analysis, and tests of diagnostic accuracy were calculated using 2 × 2contingency tables.

RESULTS

A total of 80 individuals (40 headache, 64 female, mean age 32.9 ± 13.8 yrs.) were included in the study. Mean ROM for the tests was: SBRT 31.4 ± 9.4°, FRT 44.9 ± 9.5°, and C1-2 mobility 22 hypomobile/58 normal. An SBRT cutoff score of <25° was confirmed using ROC curves. Using this cutoff score, the SBRT demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 62% specificity to detect C1-2 hypomobility.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The SBRT, using a cutoff score of ≤25°, appears to be a sensitive test to detect C1-2 dysfunction. Based on the strong sensitivity and negative predictive values, scores greater than 25° may effectively rule-out C1-2 dysfunction. The SBRT should be considered as part of a sequential clinical decision-making process when screening for C1-2 dysfunction, although further research is required to improve generalizability of these findings.

摘要

引言

颈部疼痛和头痛很常见,据报道终生患病率高达66%。上颈椎节段功能障碍被认为在颈部疼痛和多种头痛类型中具有重要意义。已经描述了几种测试来评估上颈椎关节功能障碍,包括屈伸旋转试验(FRT)、侧弯旋转试验(SBRT)和关节活动度评估(PA)。本研究的目的是确定SBRT在医学诊断为鼻窦性头痛的人群样本和对照组中检测C1-2功能障碍的诊断效度。

方法

设计:前瞻性诊断准确性研究,在一项针对医学诊断为鼻窦性头痛的个体样本的观察性病例对照研究中进行。所有参与者均使用SBRT、FRT和C1-2关节活动度评估进行评估。SBRT的诊断准确性使用同时进行的阳性FRT(与预期活动范围相比至少减少10°(≤34°))和C1-2关节活动受限的参考标准进行评估。SBRT的截断分数使用ROC曲线分析确定,诊断准确性测试使用2×2列联表计算。

结果

共有80名个体(40名头痛患者,64名女性,平均年龄32.9±13.8岁)纳入研究。各项测试的平均活动范围为:SBRT 31.4±9.4°,FRT 44.9±9.5°,C1-2活动度22例活动度降低/58例正常。使用ROC曲线确定SBRT的截断分数<25°。使用该截断分数,SBRT检测C1-2活动度降低的敏感性为100%,特异性为62%。

讨论/结论:使用≤25°的截断分数,SBRT似乎是检测C1-2功能障碍的敏感测试。基于较高的敏感性和阴性预测值,大于25°的分数可能有效地排除C1-2功能障碍。在筛查C1-2功能障碍时,SBRT应被视为序贯临床决策过程的一部分,但需要进一步研究以提高这些结果的普遍性。

相似文献

7
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.

本文引用的文献

7
User's guide to correlation coefficients.相关系数用户指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7;18(3):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
8
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
9
Neck Pain: Revision 2017.颈部疼痛:2017 年修订版。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302.
10
Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis.敏感性和特异性分析的最小样本量要求。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):YE01-YE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18129.8744. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验