Shanklin D Radford, Smalley D L
Department of Pathology, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163, USA.
Rev Environ Health. 2002 Apr-Jun;17(2):85-105. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2002.17.2.85.
Silicones have an adverse effect on human health well beyond that suggested by the recent superficial public controversy. The evidence for immune responses to injected/implanted silicones is extensive, detailed, often very specific, and not at all new. Comprehending the immunopathogenicity, realized and potential, of silicone has grown as our general understanding of the immune system has developed. Several major issues in furthering this comprehension pertain to the nature of the essential epitope, special risk of silicones to women, and definition of the chronic disease complex so evident clinically, one defying classification within currently traditional disease categories and states. The commentary presented here emphasizes the immunopathic evidence, explores the question of the essential epitope, estimates the minimal threshold of silicone load for immune reactivity, presents a profile of autoantibodies for siliconosis, and calls attention to specific silicone-based female contraceptive modalities. The silicone content of personal care products, not always revealed by retail package labeling, is explored as a potential sensitizing factor in the environment.
有机硅对人类健康的不良影响远远超出了近期表面化的公众争议所暗示的范围。针对注射/植入有机硅产生免疫反应的证据广泛、详细,往往非常具体,而且一点也不新鲜。随着我们对免疫系统的总体认识不断发展,对有机硅已认识到的和潜在的免疫致病性的理解也在加深。在进一步理解这一问题时,有几个主要问题涉及关键表位的性质、有机硅对女性的特殊风险,以及临床上如此明显的慢性疾病复合体的定义,这种疾病复合体难以归入目前传统的疾病类别和状态。此处发表的评论强调了免疫病理学证据,探讨了关键表位的问题,估计了免疫反应性的有机硅负荷最小阈值,介绍了矽肺病自身抗体的概况,并提请注意特定的基于有机硅的女性避孕方式。个人护理产品中的有机硅含量(零售包装标签并不总是会标明)被视为环境中的一个潜在致敏因素进行了探讨。