Chen Mien-Cheng, Guo G Bih-Fang, Chang Hsueh-Wen
Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Jpn Heart J. 2002 May;43(3):231-40. doi: 10.1536/jhj.43.231.
Coronary sinus (CS) pacing has been shown to prevent induction of atrial fibrillation (AF) by suppression of the propensity of atrial premature beats at high right atrium (HRA) to induce local conduction delay at the posterior triangle of Koch. However, other mechanisms of CS pacing in preventing induction of AF have not been explored. This study investigated whether a differential conduction delay exists between the HRA and distal CS pacing in patients with paroxysmal AF but not in patients without AF. Nine patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia utilizing a left accessory pathway undergoing catheter ablation were included in this study. Group 1 consisted of 5 patients with clinically documented paroxysmal AF and group 2 4 patients without a history of AF. The effective refractory periods (ERPs) of HRA, distal CS, and four different left atrial sites were determined. The interatrial conduction time and conduction delay between the HRA and distal CS during HRA or distal CS pacing were measured. The interatrial conduction delay (ICD) from the HRA to the distal CS during HRA pacing was significantly longer than that from the distal CS to the HRA during distal CS pacing in patients of group 1. However, the ICD from the HRA to the distal CS during HRA pacing was not significantly longer than that from the distal CS to the HRA during distal CS pacing in group 2 patients. A differential conduction delay between the HRA and the distal CS pacing is present in this specific population of patients with paroxysmal AF but not in patients without AF. The shorter conduction delay during DCS pacing may contribute to the prevention of induction of AF.
冠状窦(CS)起搏已被证明可通过抑制右心房高位(HRA)处房性早搏诱发科赫三角后部局部传导延迟的倾向来预防心房颤动(AF)的诱发。然而,CS起搏预防AF诱发的其他机制尚未得到探索。本研究调查了阵发性AF患者与非AF患者在HRA起搏和CS远端起搏之间是否存在传导延迟差异。本研究纳入了9例利用左侧旁路进行导管消融的房室折返性心动过速患者。第1组由5例临床记录有阵发性AF的患者组成,第2组由4例无AF病史的患者组成。测定了HRA、CS远端以及四个不同左心房部位的有效不应期(ERP)。测量了HRA起搏或CS远端起搏期间HRA与CS远端之间的心房内传导时间和传导延迟。在第1组患者中,HRA起搏期间从HRA到CS远端的心房内传导延迟(ICD)显著长于CS远端起搏期间从CS远端到HRA的ICD。然而,在第2组患者中,HRA起搏期间从HRA到CS远端的ICD并不显著长于CS远端起搏期间从CS远端到HRA的ICD。在这一特定的阵发性AF患者群体中,HRA与CS远端起搏之间存在传导延迟差异,但在非AF患者中不存在。CS远端起搏期间较短的传导延迟可能有助于预防AF的诱发。