• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管镜检查失败后挽救性体外冲击波碎石术

Salvage extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy after failed distal ureteroscopy.

作者信息

Aynehchi Shahrad, Samadi Albert A, Gallo Stephen J, Konno Sensuke, Tazaki Hiroshi, Eshghi Majid

机构信息

Department of Urology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2002 Aug;16(6):355-8. doi: 10.1089/089277902760261374.

DOI:10.1089/089277902760261374
PMID:12227908
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

When intervention is necessary, controversy remains as to the best treatment modality for stones of the distal ureter. In general, ureteroscopy is favored over extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) as the treatment of choice for distal ureteral stones. Although uncommon, ureteroscopy failures have traditionally necessitated repeat ureteroscopy to retrieve retained stone fragments. We evaluated the efficacy of salvage SWL for failed primary distal ureteroscopy in the community setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1989 to December 2000, 6099 patients underwent SWL with the Dornier HM4 lithotripter at our institution. We retrospectively identified 31 patients who had undergone the SWL after a failed distal ureteroscopy.

RESULTS

The average stone size in these patients was 9.4 mm, the average time interval from ureteroscopy to SWL was 17.2 days, and the average number of shockwaves delivered was 2386. All patients had had stents placed after ureteroscopy. Twenty-seven patients (87%) had resolution of their stone burden after one SWL session. The remaining four patients underwent additional procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy is an effective modality for the treatment of distal ureteral stones. However, when unsuccessful, a salvage procedure may be necessary. Extracorporeal lithotripsy is a less invasive procedure with comparable success rates in the distal ureter. This report suggests that salvage SWL is an appropriate option for patients in whom distal ureteroscopic stone extraction fails.

摘要

背景与目的

当需要进行干预时,对于输尿管远端结石的最佳治疗方式仍存在争议。一般来说,输尿管镜检查比体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)更受青睐,是输尿管远端结石的首选治疗方法。虽然不常见,但传统上输尿管镜检查失败后需要再次进行输尿管镜检查以取出残留的结石碎片。我们评估了在社区环境中挽救性SWL治疗原发性输尿管远端镜检查失败的疗效。

患者与方法

1989年12月至2000年12月,6099例患者在我们机构接受了多尼尔HM4碎石机的SWL治疗。我们回顾性地确定了31例输尿管远端镜检查失败后接受SWL治疗的患者。

结果

这些患者的平均结石大小为9.4mm,从输尿管镜检查到SWL的平均时间间隔为17.2天,平均冲击波发射次数为2386次。所有患者在输尿管镜检查后均放置了支架。27例患者(87%)在一次SWL治疗后结石负荷得到缓解。其余4例患者接受了额外的治疗。

结论

输尿管镜检查是治疗输尿管远端结石的有效方法。然而,当治疗失败时,可能需要采取挽救性措施。体外碎石术是一种侵入性较小的手术,在输尿管远端的成功率相当。本报告表明,挽救性SWL是输尿管远端结石取出失败患者的合适选择。

相似文献

1
Salvage extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy after failed distal ureteroscopy.输尿管镜检查失败后挽救性体外冲击波碎石术
J Endourol. 2002 Aug;16(6):355-8. doi: 10.1089/089277902760261374.
2
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗远端输尿管小结石的比较
Urol Int. 2004;73(3):238-43. doi: 10.1159/000080834.
3
Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation.输尿管结石的两年经验:体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜操作对比
J Endourol. 1998 Dec;12(6):501-4. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.501.
4
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary distal ureteral stones: does the degree of urinary obstruction affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性远端输尿管结石:尿路梗阻程度会影响治疗成功率吗?
J Endourol. 2004 Apr;18(3):237-40. doi: 10.1089/089277904773582822.
5
Total Surface Area Influences Stone Free Outcomes in Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteral Calculi.总表面积影响冲击波碎石术治疗远端输尿管结石的无石结局。
J Endourol. 2019 Aug;33(8):661-666. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0120. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
6
Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral stones: only an auxiliary measure of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or a primary therapeutic option?输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石:仅仅是体外冲击波碎石术的辅助措施还是主要治疗选择?
Urol Int. 1997;59(3):177-81. doi: 10.1159/000283057.
7
Optimal treatment for distal ureteral calculi: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy.远端输尿管结石的最佳治疗方法:体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查术的对比
J Endourol. 2001 Aug;15(6):563-6. doi: 10.1089/089277901750426292.
8
Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.体内或体外冲击波碎石术治疗远端输尿管结石?结石大小和数量对成功率的影响。
J Endourol. 1998 Aug;12(4):307-12. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.307.
9
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管远端结石:经臀入路可显著提高结石清除率。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11738.x. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
10
Primary ureteroscopy for distal-ureteral stones compared with ureteroscopy after failed extracorporeal lithotripsy.输尿管镜治疗远端输尿管结石的初次治疗与体外冲击波碎石失败后的输尿管镜治疗对比
J Endourol. 2006 Dec;20(12):1025-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.1025.

引用本文的文献

1
A prospective trial on ureteral stenting combined with secondary ureteroscopy after an initial failed procedure.一项关于输尿管支架置入联合初次手术失败后二期输尿管镜检查的前瞻性试验。
Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):593-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0476-0. Epub 2012 Apr 12.