Stein R B, Aoyagi Y, Mushahwar V K, Prochazka A
Department of Physiology, Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada.
Arch Ital Biol. 2002 Oct;140(4):273-81.
We have compared the movements generated by stimulation of muscle, nerve, spinal roots and spinal cord in anesthetized, decerebrate and spinalized cats. Each method produced a full range of movements of the cat's hind limb in the sagittal plane against a spring load, except for stimulation of the roots. Stimulation of the dorsal roots produced movements that were mainly up and forward, whereas stimulation of the ventral roots produced complementary movements (down and backward). Results from stimulation in the intermediate areas of the spinal cord were compared to predictions of the "movement primitives" hypothesis. We could not confirm that the directions were independent of stimulus amplitude or the state of descending inputs. Pros and cons of stimulating at some sites were provisionally considered for the reliable control of limb movements with functional electrical stimulation (FES) in clinical conditions.
我们比较了在麻醉、去大脑和脊髓横断的猫中,刺激肌肉、神经、脊髓神经根和脊髓所产生的运动。除了刺激神经根外,每种方法都能使猫的后肢在矢状面内对抗弹簧负荷产生一系列完整的运动。刺激背根产生的运动主要是向上和向前,而刺激腹根则产生互补的运动(向下和向后)。将脊髓中间区域的刺激结果与“运动基元”假说的预测进行了比较。我们无法证实这些方向与刺激幅度或下行输入状态无关。对于在临床条件下通过功能性电刺激(FES)可靠地控制肢体运动,我们初步考虑了在某些部位进行刺激的利弊。