Chazen O., Neumann P. M.
Plant Physiology Laboratory, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1385-1392. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1385.
We investigated mechanisms involved in inhibition of maize (Zea mays L.) leaf-elongation growth following addition of non-penetrating osmolyte to the root medium. The elongation rate of the first true leaf remained inhibited for 4 h after addition of polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG; -0.5 MPa water potential), despite progressive osmotic adjustment in the growing leaf tissues. Thus, inhibition of leaf growth did not appear to be directly related to loss of leaf capacity to maintain osmotic potential gradients. Comparative cell-wall-extension capacities of immature (still expanding) leaf tissues were measured by creep extensiometry using whole plants. Reductions in irreversible (plastic) extension capacity (i.e. wall hardening) were detected minutes and hours after addition of PEG to the roots, by both in vivo and in vitro assay. The onset of the wall-hardening response could be detected by in vitro assay only 2 min after addition of PEG. Thus, initiation of wall hardening appeared to precede transcription-regulated responses. The inhibition of both leaf growth and wall-extension capacity was reversed by removal of PEG after 4 h. Moreover, wall hardening could be induced by other osmolytes (mannitol, NaCl). Thus, the leaf responses did not appear to be related to any specific (toxic) effect of PEG. We conclude that hardening of leaf cell walls is a primary event in the chain of growth regulatory responses to PEG-induced water deficits in maize. The signaling processes by which PEG, which is not expected to penetrate root cell walls or membranes, might cause cell-wall hardening in relatively distant leaves was also investigated. Plants with live or killed roots were exposed to PEG. The killed roots were presumed to be unable to produce hormonal or electrical signals in response to addition of PEG; however, inhibition of leaf elongation and hardening of leaf cell walls were detected with both live and killed roots. Thus, neither hormonal signaling nor signaling via induced changes in surface electrical potential were necessary, and hydraulic signals appeared to generate the leaf responses.
我们研究了在根部培养基中添加非穿透性渗透剂后,玉米(Zea mays L.)叶片伸长生长受到抑制的相关机制。添加聚乙二醇6000(PEG;水势为-0.5 MPa)后,第一片真叶的伸长速率在4小时内仍受到抑制,尽管生长中的叶片组织进行了渐进性渗透调节。因此,叶片生长的抑制似乎与叶片维持渗透势梯度能力的丧失没有直接关系。使用整株植物通过蠕变延伸测量法测量了未成熟(仍在扩展)叶片组织的比较细胞壁延伸能力。在根部添加PEG后的数分钟和数小时内,通过体内和体外试验均检测到不可逆(塑性)延伸能力(即细胞壁硬化)的降低。体外试验在添加PEG后仅2分钟就能检测到细胞壁硬化反应的开始。因此,细胞壁硬化的启动似乎先于转录调控反应。4小时后去除PEG可逆转叶片生长和细胞壁延伸能力的抑制。此外,其他渗透剂(甘露醇、氯化钠)也可诱导细胞壁硬化。因此,叶片反应似乎与PEG的任何特定(毒性)效应无关。我们得出结论,叶片细胞壁的硬化是玉米对PEG诱导的水分亏缺生长调节反应链中的一个主要事件。我们还研究了预期不会穿透根细胞壁或细胞膜的PEG可能导致相对较远叶片细胞壁硬化的信号传导过程。将有活根或死根的植物暴露于PEG中。假定死根无法响应添加PEG产生激素或电信号;然而,在有活根和死根的情况下均检测到叶片伸长的抑制和叶片细胞壁硬化。因此,激素信号传导和通过表面电势诱导变化进行的信号传导都不是必需的,水力信号似乎引发了叶片反应。