Scharff L F, Hill A L, Ahumada A J
Stephen F. Austin State University, Department of Psychology, Nacogdoches, Texas, 75962, USA.
Opt Express. 2000 Feb 14;6(4):81-91. doi: 10.1364/oe.6.000081.
Several discriminability measures were examined for their ability to predict reading search times for three levels of text contrast and a range of backgrounds (plain, a periodic texture, and four spatial-frequency-filtered textures created from the periodic texture). Search times indicate that these background variations only affect readability when the text contrast is low, and that spatial frequency content of the background affects readability. These results were not well predicted by the single variables of text contrast (Spearman rank correlation = -0.64) and background RMS contrast (0.08), but a global masking index and a spatial-frequency-selective masking index led to better predictions (-0.84 and -0.81, respectively).
研究了几种可辨别性度量方法,以评估它们预测在三种文本对比度水平和一系列背景(纯色、周期性纹理以及由周期性纹理创建的四种空间频率滤波纹理)下阅读搜索时间的能力。搜索时间表明,这些背景变化仅在文本对比度较低时影响可读性,并且背景的空间频率内容会影响可读性。文本对比度的单一变量(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数=-0.64)和背景均方根对比度(0.08)并不能很好地预测这些结果,但全局掩蔽指数和空间频率选择性掩蔽指数能做出更好的预测(分别为-0.84和-0.81)。