• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

昆斯特-麦肯巴赫不平等相对指数的抽样变异性。

Sampling variability of the Kunst-Mackenbach relative index of inequality.

作者信息

Hayes L J, Berry G

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Oct;56(10):762-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.10.762.

DOI:10.1136/jech.56.10.762
PMID:12239202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1732018/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To derive methods of calculating confidence limits for the relative index of inequality, defined by Kunst and Mackenbach as a measure of the influence of socioeconomic status on an adverse health index, such as mortality rate. The methods may be used for a health outcome recorded on a continuous scale, as a Poisson count or as a binomial variable.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The confidence limits depend on the sampling variability of both the mean mortality rate and the slope of the regression line of mortality on the socioeconomic status scale variable. The best method for a continuous health outcome is based on Fieller's theorem but a good approximation is obtained by substituting the confidence limits for the slope of the regression line into the formula for the calculation of the index, or by using the variance of the logarithmic transform of the index. The last method is the most appropriate for the construction of significance tests comparing indices. The mortality rates may show statistically significant departure from linearity, while not suggesting that a linear relation is inappropriate, and the main decision is whether to base the confidence limits on the conventional standard error of the slope derived from the regression analysis or whether to use the standard deviation of the estimates of mortality rates.

摘要

研究目的

推导出计算不平等相对指数置信区间的方法,该指数由昆斯特和麦肯巴赫定义,用于衡量社会经济地位对不良健康指标(如死亡率)的影响。这些方法可用于以连续尺度记录的健康结果、作为泊松计数或作为二项式变量的情况。

结果与结论

置信区间取决于平均死亡率以及死亡率在社会经济地位尺度变量上的回归线斜率的抽样变异性。对于连续健康结果,最佳方法基于菲勒定理,但通过将回归线斜率的置信区间代入指数计算公式,或使用指数对数变换的方差,可得到较好的近似值。最后一种方法最适合用于构建比较指数的显著性检验。死亡率可能在统计上显示出与线性有显著偏差,同时并不表明线性关系不合适,主要决策是基于回归分析得出的斜率的常规标准误差来确定置信区间,还是使用死亡率估计值的标准差。

相似文献

1
Sampling variability of the Kunst-Mackenbach relative index of inequality.昆斯特-麦肯巴赫不平等相对指数的抽样变异性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Oct;56(10):762-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.10.762.
2
Relative index of inequality and slope index of inequality: a structured regression framework for estimation.相对不平等指数和斜率不平等指数:一种用于估计的结构化回归框架。
Epidemiology. 2015 Jul;26(4):518-27. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000311.
3
Confidence intervals and sample-size calculations for the sisterhood method of estimating maternal mortality.用于估计孕产妇死亡率的姐妹会方法的置信区间和样本量计算。
Stud Fam Plann. 1996 Jul-Aug;27(4):220-7.
4
Evolution of fetal mortality in the setting of Argentine socioeconomic inequalities. Period 2007-2014.阿根廷社会经济不平等背景下的胎儿死亡率演变。2007 - 2014年期间。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2018 Aug 1;116(4):e567-e574. doi: 10.5546/aap.2018.eng.e567.
5
Impact of the 1990 Hong Kong legislation for restriction on sulfur content in fuel.1990年香港燃料含硫量限制立法的影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Aug(170):5-91.
6
Socioeconomic differentials in mortality among men within Great Britain: time trends and contributory causes.英国男性死亡率的社会经济差异:时间趋势及促成因素
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Apr;52(4):214-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.4.214.
7
An easy to use method to approximate Poisson confidence limits.一种用于近似泊松置信区间的简便方法。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(3):213-6. doi: 10.1007/s10654-004-6517-4.
8
Inequality in health: socioeconomic differentials in mortality in Rome, 1990-95.健康不平等:1990 - 1995年罗马死亡率的社会经济差异
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Nov;53(11):687-93. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.11.687.
9
Methods for confidence interval estimation of a ratio parameter with application to location quotients.用于比率参数置信区间估计的方法及其在区位商中的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Oct 12;5:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-32.
10
[An evaluation of the statistical significance and calculation of the confidence interval for the standardized mortality ratio].[标准化死亡率比的统计学显著性评估及置信区间计算]
Gac Sanit. 1993 Sep-Oct;7(38):237-43. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(93)71156-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequities in mortality and potential years of life lost (PYLL) in greater Santiago, Chile, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.智利大圣地亚哥在新冠疫情期间及之后的死亡率不平等和潜在寿命损失年数(PYLL)
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 10;24(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02575-3.
2
Provincial inequality of China's progress towards universal health coverage: An empirical analysis in 2016-21.中国全民健康覆盖进展的省级不平等:2016-2021 年的实证分析。
J Glob Health. 2024 Jun 28;14:04122. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04122.
3
Understanding pathways to inequalities in child mental health: a counterfactual mediation analysis in two national birth cohorts in the UK and Denmark.理解儿童心理健康不平等的途径:英国和丹麦两个全国性出生队列的反事实中介分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 12;10(10):e040056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040056.
4
How do early-life adverse childhood experiences mediate the relationship between childhood socioeconomic conditions and adolescent health outcomes in the UK?在英国,童年早期不良经历如何调节童年社会经济状况与青少年健康结果之间的关系?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):969-975. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-213817. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
5
The Associations of Income, Education and Income Inequality and Subjective Well-Being among Elderly in Hong Kong-A Multilevel Analysis.香港老年人的收入、教育和收入不平等与主观幸福感之间的关联——多层次分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041271.
6
How do early-life factors explain social inequalities in adolescent mental health? Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study.早期生活因素如何解释青少年心理健康的社会不平等?来自英国千禧年队列研究的发现。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Nov;73(11):1049-1060. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-212367. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
7
Monitoring health inequalities when the socio-economic composition changes: are the slope and relative indices of inequality appropriate? Results of a simulation study.监测社会经济构成变化时的健康不平等:斜率和相对不平等指数是否合适?一项模拟研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 30;19(1):662. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6980-1.
8
Migration-related changes in smoking among non-Western immigrants in France.法国非西方移民的吸烟与迁移相关变化。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Jun 1;29(3):453-457. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky230.
9
Social inequalities in health and mental health in France. The results of a 2010 population-based survey in Paris Metropolitan Area.法国的健康和心理健康中的社会不平等。2010 年巴黎大都市区基于人群的调查结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 14;13(9):e0203676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203676. eCollection 2018.
10
Parental socioeconomic status and risk of cerebral palsy in the child: evidence from two Nordic population-based cohorts.父母的社会经济地位与儿童脑瘫风险:来自两个北欧基于人群的队列研究证据。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;47(4):1298-1306. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy139.

本文引用的文献

1
Social class inequality in mortality from 1921 to 1972 in England and Wales.1921年至1972年英格兰和威尔士社会阶层在死亡率方面的不平等。
Popul Stud (Camb). 1985 Mar;39(1):17-31. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000141256.
2
Changes in social inequalities in health in the Basque Country.巴斯克地区健康方面社会不平等现象的变化。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jun;54(6):437-43. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.6.437.
3
Stillbirth risk with social class and deprivation: no evidence for increasing inequality.社会阶层与贫困状况下的死产风险:不存在不平等加剧的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):147-55. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00169-9.
4
An additional dimension to health inequalities: disease severity and socioeconomic position.健康不平等的另一个层面:疾病严重程度与社会经济地位。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Oct;53(10):603-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.10.603.
5
The magnitude of differences in perceived general health associated with educational level in the regions of Spain.西班牙各地区与教育水平相关的总体健康感知差异程度。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 May;53(5):288-93. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.5.288.
6
Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk?教育程度与职业社会阶层:哪一个是死亡风险更重要的指标?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Mar;52(3):153-60. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.3.153.
7
Differences in self reported morbidity by educational level: a comparison of 11 western European countries.按教育水平划分的自我报告发病率差异:11个西欧国家的比较
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Apr;52(4):219-27. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.4.219.
8
Socioeconomic differentials in mortality among men within Great Britain: time trends and contributory causes.英国男性死亡率的社会经济差异:时间趋势及促成因素
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Apr;52(4):214-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.4.214.
9
Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe. The EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health.西欧发病率和死亡率方面的社会经济不平等。欧盟健康领域社会经济不平等问题工作组。
Lancet. 1997 Jun 7;349(9066):1655-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07226-1.
10
Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe.衡量健康方面社会经济不平等的程度:以欧洲的两个例子说明现有衡量方法概述。
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):757-71. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00073-1.