Beyene Joseph, Moineddin Rahim
Department of Public Health Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Oct 12;5:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-32.
The location quotient (LQ) ratio, a measure designed to quantify and benchmark the degree of relative concentration of an activity in the analysis of area localization, has received considerable attention in the geographic and economics literature. This index can also naturally be applied in the context of population health to quantify and compare health outcomes across spatial domains. However, one commonly observed limitation of LQ is its widespread use as only a point estimate without an accompanying confidence interval.
In this paper we present statistical methods that can be used to construct confidence intervals for location quotients. The delta and Fieller's methods are generic approaches for a ratio parameter and the generalized linear modelling framework is a useful re-parameterization particularly helpful for generating profile-likelihood based confidence intervals for the location quotient. A simulation experiment is carried out to assess the performance of each of the analytic approaches and a health utilization data set is used for illustration.
Both the simulation results as well as the findings from the empirical data show that the different analytical methods produce very similar confidence limits for location quotients. When incidence of outcome is not rare and sample sizes are large, the confidence limits are almost indistinguishable. The confidence limits from the generalized linear model approach might be preferable in small sample situations.
LQ is a useful measure which allows quantification and comparison of health and other outcomes across defined geographical regions. It is a very simple index to compute and has a straightforward interpretation. Reporting this estimate with appropriate confidence limits using methods presented in this paper will make the measure particularly attractive for policy and decision makers.
区位商(LQ)比率是一种用于量化和衡量区域定位分析中某项活动相对集中程度的指标,在地理和经济学文献中受到了广泛关注。该指数也可自然地应用于人口健康领域,以量化和比较不同空间区域的健康结果。然而,区位商常见的一个局限性是,它通常仅作为一个点估计值使用,没有附带置信区间。
在本文中,我们提出了可用于构建区位商置信区间的统计方法。德尔塔方法和菲勒方法是用于比率参数的通用方法,广义线性建模框架是一种有用的重新参数化方法,特别有助于生成基于轮廓似然的区位商置信区间。我们进行了一项模拟实验,以评估每种分析方法的性能,并使用一个卫生利用数据集进行说明。
模拟结果以及实证数据的结果均表明,不同的分析方法得出的区位商置信限非常相似。当结果发生率不低且样本量较大时,置信限几乎难以区分。在小样本情况下,广义线性模型方法得出的置信限可能更可取。
区位商是一种有用的指标,可用于量化和比较特定地理区域内的健康及其他结果。它是一个非常简单的计算指数,且解释直观。使用本文提出的方法报告该估计值及其适当的置信限,将使该指标对政策制定者和决策者特别有吸引力。