Rogers A
Math Popul Stud. 1995 Jul;5(3):187-202, 291. doi: 10.1080/08898489509525401.
"This paper reviews the growing literature on population forecasting to examine a curious paradox: despite continuing refinements in the specification of models used to represent population dynamics, simple exponential growth models, it is claimed, continue to outperform such more complex models in forecasting exercises. Shrinking a large complex model in order to simplify it typically involves two processes: aggregation and decomposition. Both processes are known to introduce biases into the resulting representations of population dynamics. Thus it is difficult to accept the conclusion that simple models outperform complex models. Moreover, assessments of forecasting performance are notoriously difficult to carry out, because they inevitably depend not only on the models used but also on the particular historical periods selected for examination.... This paper reviews some of the recent debate on the simple versus complex modeling issue and links it to the questions of model bias and distributional momentum impacts." (SUMMARY IN FRE)
本文回顾了关于人口预测的越来越多的文献,以审视一个奇怪的悖论:尽管用于描述人口动态的模型在规格上不断完善,但据称,在预测实践中,简单的指数增长模型仍比此类更复杂的模型表现更好。为了简化而缩减一个大型复杂模型通常涉及两个过程:聚合和分解。众所周知,这两个过程都会在由此产生的人口动态表示中引入偏差。因此,很难接受简单模型比复杂模型表现更好的结论。此外,预测性能评估 notoriously 难以进行,因为它们不可避免地不仅取决于所使用的模型,还取决于为检验而选择的特定历史时期……本文回顾了最近关于简单建模与复杂建模问题的一些争论,并将其与模型偏差和分布动量影响问题联系起来。(摘要用法语)
“notoriously”在这里较难准确翻译出一个完全符合语境又通顺的中文词,暂保留英文,读者可根据具体语境灵活理解其含义,比如“众所周知地(往往是负面情况)” 。