Suppr超能文献

减少并联电导测量中的误差。

Reducing errors in parallel conductance measurement.

作者信息

Amirhamzeh Mehrdad M R

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Presbyterian Heart Group, Albuquerque, USA.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2002 Sep-Oct;48(5):520-5. doi: 10.1097/00002480-200209000-00014.

Abstract

Conductance (COND) measures left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) volume continuously during the cardiac cycle. COND measurement of the ventricle can be impaired by electrically conductive factors extrinsic to the heart that cause an artifactual increase in COND. This is known as parallel COND. A hypertonic saline injection has traditionally been used to measure parallel COND. The entry of hypertonic saline into the ventricle causes a rise (ascending region) in ventricular COND tracing, whereas its dissipation causes a fall (descending region). The hypothesis of this study is that parallel COND measurement can vary based on the region of COND tracing (ascending versus descending versus both) chosen for calculations. Parallel COND was measured in the LV (15 pigs and 5 sheep) and the RV (13 pigs and 5 sheep). In the LV, average +/- standard error of mean (SEM) parallel COND measured from the ascending region (55.4 +/- 9.2) was significantly different (p < 0.05) from the descending region and from both regions (72.2 +/- 10.3 and 66.4 +/- 9.2, respectively). Additionally, LV parallel COND measured from the descending region and from both regions were not different (p = NS; 72.2 +/- 10.3 and 66.4 +/- 9.2, respectively). In the RV, there was no significant difference (p = NS) among parallel COND calculated from ascending, descending, and both regions (102.9 +/- 8.1, 105.6 +/- 10.0, and 103.9 +/- 7.5, respectively). Average +/- SEM number of points used for parallel COND calculation (N) in the LV for each region (ascending versus descending versus both) were significantly different (p < 0.05) from one another (8 +/- 1 vs 11 +/- 1 vs 18 +/- 1). Similarly, N values used for the calculation of RV parallel COND in ascending versus descending versus both regions were significantly different (p < 0.05) from one another (6 +/- 1 vs 9 +/- 1 vs 14 +/- 1). In conclusion, there were significant differences in parallel COND calculation based on varying regions of LV COND. This was not true for the RV. To reduce errors that are caused by the differences cited here, one region should be used consistently to measure parallel COND. More study will be required to determine the optimal region of the COND tracing for the determination of parallel COND.

摘要

电导(COND)在心动周期中持续测量左心室(LV)和右心室(RV)容积。心室的COND测量可能会受到心脏外部导电因素的影响,这些因素会导致COND出现人为增加。这被称为平行COND。传统上使用高渗盐水注射来测量平行COND。高渗盐水进入心室会导致心室COND描记图上升(上升段),而其消散则会导致下降(下降段)。本研究的假设是,平行COND测量可能会因用于计算的COND描记图区域(上升段与下降段与两者)而有所不同。在左心室(15头猪和5只羊)和右心室(13头猪和5只羊)中测量了平行COND。在左心室中,从上升段测量的平均±平均标准误差(SEM)平行COND(55.4±9.2)与下降段以及两者测量值(分别为72.2±10.3和66.4±9.2)有显著差异(p<0.05)。此外,从下降段和两者测量的左心室平行COND没有差异(p=无显著性差异;分别为72.2±10.3和66.4±9.2)。在右心室中,从上升段、下降段和两者计算的平行COND之间没有显著差异(p=无显著性差异;分别为102.9±8.1、105.6±10.0和103.9±7.5)。左心室每个区域(上升段与下降段与两者)用于平行COND计算的平均±SEM点数(N)彼此有显著差异(p<0.05)(8±1对11±1对18±1)。同样,用于计算右心室上升段、下降段和两者平行COND的N值彼此有显著差异(p<0.05)(6±1对9±1对14±1)。总之,基于左心室COND不同区域的平行COND计算存在显著差异。右心室则并非如此。为减少此处所述差异引起的误差,应始终使用一个区域来测量平行COND。需要更多研究来确定用于确定平行COND的COND描记图的最佳区域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验