Suppr超能文献

影响原位左心室传导的外在因素。

Extrinsic factors influencing left ventricular conductance in situ.

作者信息

Amirhamzeh M M, Jia C X, Spotnitz H M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032.

出版信息

Circulation. 1994 Nov;90(5 Pt 2):II347-52.

PMID:7955277
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of conductance measurement of left ventricular (LV) volume is affected by parallel conductance (Vp) from right ventricular (RV) volume as well as surroundings of the heart. No studies have quantified the extrinsic influences on Vp.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In six anesthetized pigs, using a median sternotomy and pericardial well, implantable cardioverter defibrillator patches, normal saline, or echocardiography gel were introduced and removed. LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) did not change significantly with these interventions. Raw LV conductance was used to estimate end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and stroke volume (SV). Saline significantly increased mean +/- SEM calculated LVEDV from 106 +/- 8 to 131 +/- 6 mL and calculated LVESV from 81 +/- 7 to 110 +/- 5 mL; calculated SV decreased from 25 +/- 3 to 21 +/- 2 mL (P < .05, paired t test). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator patches and gel did not significantly change calculated LV volumes. LV conductance was also measured in arrested hearts during LV filling (5 to 60 mL) at four levels of RV volume (RVV). Using a fixed value for Vp, calculated mean LV volume was 30 +/- 3 mL at RVV = 0, 32 +/- 3 mL at RVV = 20, 33 +/- 3 mL at RVV = 40, and 36 +/- 3 mL at RVV = 60 (P < .01, repeated-measures ANOVA).

CONCLUSIONS

While implantable cardioverter defibrillator patches and gel have no statistically significant effect, saline and RVV affect LV volume calculations by conductance, requiring special techniques during cardiopulmonary bypass or caval occlusion.

摘要

背景

左心室(LV)容积电导测量的准确性受右心室(RV)容积及心脏周围组织的并联电导(Vp)影响。尚无研究对Vp的外在影响进行量化。

方法与结果

对6只麻醉猪经胸骨正中切口和心包腔,分别置入和移除植入式心脏复律除颤器贴片、生理盐水或超声心动图凝胶。这些干预措施并未使左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)发生显著变化。采用原始左心室电导估算舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、收缩末期容积(LVESV)和每搏输出量(SV)。生理盐水使计算得出的平均±标准误LVEDV从106±8 mL显著增加至131±6 mL,计算得出的LVESV从81±7 mL增加至110±5 mL;计算得出的SV从25±3 mL降至21±2 mL(配对t检验,P<.05)。植入式心脏复律除颤器贴片和凝胶未使计算得出的左心室容积发生显著变化。还在心脏停搏时,于四个右心室容积(RVV)水平(5至60 mL)测量左心室充盈期的左心室电导。采用固定的Vp值,计算得出的平均左心室容积在RVV = 0时为30±3 mL,RVV = 20时为32±3 mL,RVV = 40时为33±3 mL,RVV = 60时为36±3 mL(重复测量方差分析,P<.01)。

结论

虽然植入式心脏复律除颤器贴片和凝胶无统计学显著影响,但生理盐水和RVV会影响基于电导的左心室容积计算,在体外循环或腔静脉阻断期间需要采用特殊技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验