Della Rocca Giorgio, Costa Gabriella M, Coccia Cecilia, Pompei Livia, Di Marco Pierangelo, Pietropaoli Paolo
Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Anesth Analg. 2002 Oct;95(4):835-43, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200210000-00009.
In this study, during lung transplantation, we analyzed a conventional preload index, the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), and a new preload index, the intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), derived from the single-indicator transpulmonary dilution technique (PiCCO System), with respect to stroke volume index (SVIpa). We also evaluated the relationships between changes (Delta) in ITBVI and PAOP and DeltaSVIpa during lung transplantation. The reproducibility and precision of all cardiac index measurements obtained with the transpulmonary single-indicator dilution technique (CIart) and with the pulmonary artery thermodilution technique (CIpa) were also determined. Measurements were made in 50 patients monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter and with a PiCCO System at six stages throughout the study. Changes in the variables were calculated by subtracting the first from the second measurement (Delta(1)) and so on (Delta(1) to Delta(5)). The linear correlation between ITBVI and SVIpa was significant (r(2)=0.41; P < 0.0001), whereas PAOP poorly correlated with SVIpa (r(2) = -0.01). Changes in ITBVI correlated with changes in SVIpa (Delta(1), r(2) = 0.30; Delta(2), r(2) = 0.57; Delta(4), r(2) = 0.26; and Delta(5), r(2) = 0.67), whereas PAOP failed. The mean bias between CIart and CIpa was 0.15 l. min(-1). m(-2) (1.37). In conclusion, ITBVI is a valid indicator of cardiac preload and may be superior to PAOP in patients undergoing lung transplantation.
The assessment of intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) by the transpulmonary single-indicator technique is a useful tool in lung transplant patients, providing a valid index of cardiac preload that may be superior to pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. However, more prospective, randomized studies are necessary to evaluate the role and limitations of this technique.
在本研究中,我们在肺移植过程中分析了一种传统的前负荷指标——肺动脉闭塞压(PAOP),以及一种新的前负荷指标——胸腔内血容量指数(ITBVI),后者通过单指示剂经肺稀释技术(PiCCO系统)得出,并与每搏量指数(SVIpa)进行了比较。我们还评估了肺移植过程中ITBVI和PAOP的变化(Delta)与DeltaSVIpa之间的关系。同时还确定了经肺单指示剂稀释技术(CIart)和肺动脉热稀释技术(CIpa)所获得的所有心排血量测量值的可重复性和精确性。在整个研究过程中的六个阶段,对50例使用肺动脉导管和PiCCO系统进行监测的患者进行了测量。变量的变化通过第二次测量值减去第一次测量值(Delta(1))来计算,依此类推(Delta(1)至Delta(5))。ITBVI与SVIpa之间的线性相关性显著(r(2)=0.41;P < 0.0001),而PAOP与SVIpa的相关性较差(r(2) = -0.01)。ITBVI的变化与SVIpa的变化相关(Delta(1),r(2) = 0.30;Delta(2),r(2) = 0.57;Delta(4),r(2) = 0.26;Delta(5),r(2) = 0.67),而PAOP则不然。CIart和CIpa之间的平均偏差为0.15 l·min(-1)·m(-2)(1.37)。总之,ITBVI是心脏前负荷的有效指标,在肺移植患者中可能优于PAOP。
经肺单指示剂技术评估胸腔内血容量指数(ITBVI)是肺移植患者的一种有用工具,可提供可能优于肺动脉闭塞压的有效心脏前负荷指标。然而,需要更多前瞻性、随机研究来评估该技术的作用和局限性。