• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Conflict of interest and medical publication.

作者信息

Reidenberg Marcus M

机构信息

Dept. of Pharmacology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Jul;8(3):455-7. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0067-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-002-0067-5
PMID:12353375
Abstract

One of the important causes of bias in the medical literature is failure to publish data because it is "negative". Usually, this is due to failure to write a manuscript and submit it for publication. Since publication is an essential part of research and patients have been recruited into a study in the belief that they are participating in medical research, there is an ethical commitment to publish the observations made on volunteer subjects. This can be enforced by ethical committees if they refuse to approve studies of investigators and sponsors who have failed to publish earlier studies.

摘要

相似文献

1
Conflict of interest and medical publication.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Jul;8(3):455-7. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0067-5.
2
Is selective reporting of clinical research unethical as well as unscientific?临床研究的选择性报告是否既不道德又不科学?
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jan;37(1):1-7.
3
Commentary: an independent voice?: conflicts of interest and research on ethical, legal and social issues.评论:一种独立的声音?:利益冲突与伦理、法律和社会问题研究
Health Law Rev. 2005;13(2-3):114-6.
4
Research ethics committees and conflicts of interest.研究伦理委员会与利益冲突。
Bull Med Ethics. 2003 Sep(191):13-6.
5
Registering clinical trials.临床试验注册
JAMA. 2003 Jul 23;290(4):516-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.4.516.
6
Media portrayal of conflicts of interest in herbal remedy clinical trials.媒体对草药疗法临床试验中利益冲突的描述。
Health Law Rev. 2006;15(1):9-11.
7
Research, ethics and conflicts of interest.研究、伦理与利益冲突。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):259-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.259.
8
Assessing research results in the medical literature: trust but verify.评估医学文献中的研究结果:信任但要核实。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 24;173(12):1053-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.829.
9
Legal and ethical issues associated with patient recruitment in clinical trials: the case of competitive enrolment.临床试验中与患者招募相关的法律和伦理问题:竞争性入组案例
Health Law Rev. 2005;13(2-3):58-61.
10
Publication: an ethical imperative.发表:一项道德要求。
BMJ. 1995 May 20;310(6990):1313-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6990.1313.

引用本文的文献

1
Gap in publication of comparative information on new medicines.新药比较信息的发布差距。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 May;65(5):716-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03092.x. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening mammography: setting the record straight.
Lancet. 2002 Feb 2;359(9304):442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07571-2.
2
Lessons for research ethics committees.
Lancet. 2002 Jan 12;359(9301):174. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07361-0.
3
Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):290-2.
4
Maintaining the integrity of the clinical evidence base.维护临床证据基础的完整性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(12):1093.
5
Industry-sponsored clinical research: a double-edged sword.行业资助的临床研究:一把双刃剑。
Lancet. 2001 Dec 1;358(9296):1893-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06891-X.
6
Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.赞助、作者身份与责任。
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Sep 18;135(6):463-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-00016.
7
Releasing the grip of big pharma.摆脱大型制药公司的控制。
Lancet. 2001 Aug 25;358(9282):664. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05789-0.
8
Uneasy alliance--clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry.不安的联盟——临床研究人员与制药行业
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1539-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422024.
9
Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish.医学专业会议的未发表研究:研究者未发表成果的原因
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):257-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.257.
10
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting.提交至科学会议的研究摘要结果中的阳性结果偏倚及其他局限性。
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):254-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.254.