Ramírez J J, Frostell B, Galindo R
VBB VIAK/SWECO, Stockholm, Sweden.
Water Sci Technol. 2002;46(4-5):381-7.
In the 5th Region, located in central Chile, infrastructure projects are being implemented in order to increase the capacity to treat and dispose of sewage. In order to analyse the sludge management alternatives the ORWARE model was used. The research project was divided in two stages: in the first stage, the sewage and sludge management strategies to be compared as well as the objectives were established. The management alternatives chosen were for chemical or biological treatment of sewage while for sludge the management alternatives were based on digestion, composting or lime stabilisation. The second stage included simulation and analysis of results. The main conclusions of the work were: if "lowest possible emissions" is the main objective of sewage treatment, biological treatment should be applied. Regarding pathogen reduction, both chemical precipitation and biological treatment attain an adequate reduction if the treated sewage is to be discharged to the sea. On the other hand, additional disinfection is needed in the case of discharge to rivers. Control at source should be stressed to avoid heavy metals and toxic organic compounds in the sludge.
在位于智利中部的第五大区,正在实施基础设施项目,以提高污水的处理和处置能力。为了分析污泥管理的替代方案,使用了ORWARE模型。该研究项目分为两个阶段:在第一阶段,确定了要比较的污水和污泥管理策略以及目标。选择的管理替代方案是对污水进行化学或生物处理,而对于污泥,管理替代方案基于消化、堆肥或石灰稳定化。第二阶段包括结果的模拟和分析。这项工作的主要结论是:如果“尽可能低排放”是污水处理的主要目标,应采用生物处理。关于病原体减少,如果处理后的污水要排放到海里,化学沉淀和生物处理都能实现充分减少。另一方面,如果排放到河流,则需要额外的消毒。应强调源头控制,以避免污泥中含有重金属和有毒有机化合物。