• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

侧面碰撞中的主动脉损伤:初步分析

Aortic injuries in side impacts: a preliminary analysis.

作者信息

Franklyn Melanie, Fitzharris Michael, Yang King, Frampton Richard, Morris Andrew, Fildes Brian

机构信息

Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2002;46:113-24.

PMID:12361503
Abstract

Injuries to the aorta are among the more serious injuries that result from vehicle impacts, and may often be fatal. This paper examined the incidence of aortic injuries in the US and UK using real-world crash data. The main outcome of interest was the level of risk associated with each principal direction of force for drivers and front seat passengers with respect to sustaining aortic injuries. The results indicate that the risk of sustaining an injury to the aorta is greater for near side crashes than for far side crashes. Further, it is apparent that given a near side crash, the risk of an aortic injury is greater on the left side of the body (and left side of the vehicle) than on the right. It was also found that the delta-V of crashes where occupants sustained an injury to the aorta was considerably higher than crashes where occupants did not sustain aortic injuries. It was speculated that the anatomical asymmetry of the thorax might play a role in the differences seen in injury risk associated with different impact directions. Limitations and further planned research are discussed.

摘要

主动脉损伤是车辆碰撞导致的较为严重的损伤之一,且常常可能致命。本文利用实际碰撞数据研究了美国和英国主动脉损伤的发生率。主要关注的结果是,对于驾驶员和前排乘客而言,与每种主要受力方向相关的主动脉损伤风险水平。结果表明,近侧碰撞导致主动脉损伤的风险高于远侧碰撞。此外,很明显,在近侧碰撞中,身体左侧(以及车辆左侧)发生主动脉损伤的风险高于右侧。研究还发现,乘客发生主动脉损伤的碰撞中速度变化量远高于乘客未发生主动脉损伤的碰撞。据推测,胸部的解剖学不对称可能在不同碰撞方向相关的损伤风险差异中起作用。文中讨论了研究的局限性和进一步的研究计划。

相似文献

1
Aortic injuries in side impacts: a preliminary analysis.侧面碰撞中的主动脉损伤:初步分析
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2002;46:113-24.
2
A preliminary analysis of aortic injuries in lateral impacts.侧面撞击中主动脉损伤的初步分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;4(3):263-9. doi: 10.1080/15389580309883.
3
Thoracic aortic injury in motor vehicle crashes: the effect of impact direction, side of body struck, and seat belt use.机动车碰撞事故中的胸主动脉损伤:撞击方向、身体受撞侧及安全带使用情况的影响
J Trauma. 2004 Sep;57(3):582-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000088015.83951.d0.
4
Seat position and the risk of serious thoracoabdominal injury in lateral motor vehicle crashes.侧方机动车碰撞中座位位置与严重胸腹损伤风险
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jul;37(4):668-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.008. Epub 2005 Apr 2.
5
Motor vehicle-related cardiac and aortic injuries differ from other thoracic injuries.机动车相关的心脏和主动脉损伤不同于其他胸部损伤。
J Trauma. 2007 Jun;62(6):1462-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000221271.76676.2e.
6
Incidence and crash mechanisms of aortic injury during the past decade.过去十年间主动脉损伤的发生率及碰撞机制。
J Trauma. 2007 Mar;62(3):664-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318031b58c.
7
Steering wheel deformity and serious thoracic or abdominal injury among drivers and passengers involved in motor vehicle crashes.机动车碰撞事故中驾驶员和乘客的方向盘变形及严重胸腹部损伤。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;45(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.09.011.
8
Aortic injuries in newer vehicles.新型车辆中的主动脉损伤。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
9
Injury and side impact air bag deployment in near and far sided motor vehicle crashes, United States, 2000-2005.2000 - 2005年美国近侧和远侧机动车碰撞事故中的伤害与侧面碰撞安全气囊展开情况
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1333-8; discussion 1338-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818cac13.
10
Aortic ruptures in seat belt wearers.佩戴安全带者的主动脉破裂。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Sep;98(3):355-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographics, Velocity Distributions, and Impact Type as Predictors of AIS 4+ Head Injuries in Motor Vehicle Crashes.人口统计学、速度分布和碰撞类型作为机动车碰撞中AIS 4级及以上头部损伤的预测因素。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:267-80.
2
Worldsid assessment of far side impact countermeasures.世界对远侧碰撞对策的评估。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2006;50:199-219.