Suppr超能文献

口服抗凝治疗患者狼疮抗凝物的实验室诊断。稀释蝰蛇毒时间试验和硅土凝固时间与Staclot LA检测法的性能比较

Laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants for patients on oral anticoagulant treatment. Performance of dilute Russell viper venom test and silica clotting time in comparison with Staclot LA.

作者信息

Tripodi Armando, Chantarangkul Veena, Clerici Marigrazia, Mannucci Pier Mannuccio

机构信息

Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University and IRCCS Maggiore Hospital, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2002 Oct;88(4):583-6.

Abstract

The detection of lupus anticoagulant (LA) in plasmas from patients on oral anticoagulants is problematic because of their prolonged clotting times. Mixing of patients and normal plasmas prior to testing for LA is employed to overcome this problem. We investigated the diagnostic efficacy of silica clotting time (SCT) and dilute Russell viper venom test (dRVVT) performed at low and high phospholipid concentrations, to diagnose LA in patients on oral anticoagulants, in comparison with Staclot LA (Stago) performed with and without hexagonal phospholipids and normal plasma. Case materials were 114 filtered plasmas from patients on oral anticoagulants with (n = 62) and without (n = 52) the antiphospholipid syndrome. Plasmas were considered LA-positive when Staclot LA (taken as the "gold standard") was diagnostic for LA. Forty-four plasmas were positive with Staclot LA. Forty and 39 of these were also positive with SCT and dRVVT (sensitivity relative to Staclot LA was 91% and 89%, respectively). Seventy plasmas were negative with Staclot LA. Three of these were positive with both SCT and dRVVT (specificity relative to Staclot LA was 96%). Kappa values for measure of agreement were 0.87 and 0.85 (p <0.001), respectively. In conclusion, SCT and dRVVT performed at low and high phospholipid concentrations without normal plasma can be considered as reliable as Staclot LA performed with hexagonal phospholipids and normal plasma to diagnose LA in patients on oral anticoagulants. Advantages of SCT and Drvvt over Staclot LA are easy automation, no need for normal plasma and relatively low cost.

摘要

对于正在接受口服抗凝剂治疗的患者,由于其血浆凝血时间延长,检测狼疮抗凝物(LA)存在问题。在检测LA之前将患者血浆与正常血浆混合,以克服这一问题。我们研究了在低和高磷脂浓度下进行的硅土凝血时间(SCT)和稀释蝰蛇毒时间(dRVVT)的诊断效能,以诊断正在接受口服抗凝剂治疗的患者中的LA,并与使用和不使用六角形磷脂及正常血浆的Staclot LA(Stago)进行比较。病例材料为114份来自正在接受口服抗凝剂治疗的患者的过滤血浆,其中62例患有抗磷脂综合征,52例未患抗磷脂综合征。当Staclot LA(作为“金标准”)诊断为LA时,血浆被认为是LA阳性。44份血浆经Staclot LA检测为阳性。其中40份和39份经SCT和dRVVT检测也为阳性(相对于Staclot LA的敏感性分别为91%和89%)。70份血浆经Staclot LA检测为阴性。其中3份经SCT和dRVVT检测均为阳性(相对于Staclot LA的特异性为96%)。一致性测量的Kappa值分别为0.87和0.85(p<0.001)。总之,在不使用正常血浆的情况下,在低和高磷脂浓度下进行的SCT和dRVVT在诊断正在接受口服抗凝剂治疗的患者中的LA方面,可以被认为与使用六角形磷脂及正常血浆的Staclot LA一样可靠。SCT和Drvvt相对于Staclot LA的优点是易于自动化、无需正常血浆且成本相对较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验