Bradley Dewayne T, Hashisaki George T, Mason John C
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Hospitals, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2002 Oct;112(10):1726-9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200210000-00003.
The treatment of otogenic sigmoid sinus thrombosis with surgery and antibiotics is well established. However, the role of anticoagulation remains unstudied. The study reviews the signs, symptoms, radiological evaluation, surgical treatment, and medical management of patients with otogenic sigmoid sinus thrombosis treated with or without anticoagulation.
Retrospective review of nine patients from 1995 to 2001 with sigmoid sinus thrombosis.
Patients were identified by a review of all medical and radiological records. Signs, symptoms, diagnostic studies, treatments, and outcomes were recorded. In addition, telephone follow-up was performed. RESULTS Nine patients were identified over a 6-year period from 1995 to 2001. Patients had a mean follow-up time of 9 months (range, 1-24 mo). Of the nine patients identified, eight patients (89%) had tympanostomy tube placement, six patients (67%) had canal wall intact mastoidectomy, and one patient (11%) had canal wall down mastoidectomy. Needle aspiration of the sinus was performed in four of nine patients (44%), and incision of the sinus in two of nine (22%). Treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics occurred in all patients with a mean duration of 12 days (range, 2-22 d) intravenously and 7 days (range, 0-21 d) orally. Sixty-seven percent of patients (six of nine) were anticoagulated: Five patients received low-molecular-weight heparin, and one patient received heparin-coumadin. No mortality occurred in either the anticoagulated or non-anticoagulated group. One anticoagulated patient did have persistent headaches and otorrhea.
Surgery and antibiotic therapy are the cornerstones of the management of otogenic sigmoid sinus thrombosis. However, the role of anticoagulation remains unclear. Because complications of embolization and persistent sepsis are low in otogenic sigmoid sinus thrombosis patients treated with or without anticoagulation, withholding anticoagulation in selected patients is reasonable. Serial imaging to monitor for thrombus progression is advisable.
采用手术和抗生素治疗耳源性乙状窦血栓形成已得到充分认可。然而,抗凝治疗的作用仍未得到研究。本研究回顾了接受或未接受抗凝治疗的耳源性乙状窦血栓形成患者的体征、症状、影像学评估、手术治疗及药物治疗情况。
对1995年至2001年间9例乙状窦血栓形成患者进行回顾性研究。
通过查阅所有医疗和放射学记录来确定患者。记录体征、症状、诊断性检查、治疗方法及结果。此外,还进行了电话随访。结果在1995年至2001年的6年期间共确定了9例患者。患者的平均随访时间为9个月(范围1 - 24个月)。在确定的9例患者中,8例(89%)进行了鼓膜置管,6例(67%)进行了外耳道后壁完整的乳突切除术,1例(11%)进行了外耳道后壁下翻乳突切除术。9例患者中有4例(44%)进行了窦腔穿刺抽吸,9例中有2例(22%)进行了窦腔切开。所有患者均接受了广谱抗生素治疗,静脉用药平均持续时间为12天(范围2 - 22天),口服平均持续时间为7天(范围0 - 21天)。67%的患者(9例中的6例)接受了抗凝治疗:5例患者接受了低分子量肝素治疗,1例患者接受了肝素 - 香豆素治疗。抗凝组和非抗凝组均未发生死亡。1例接受抗凝治疗的患者确实出现了持续性头痛和耳漏。
手术和抗生素治疗是耳源性乙状窦血栓形成治疗的基石。然而,抗凝治疗的作用仍不明确。由于接受或未接受抗凝治疗的耳源性乙状窦血栓形成患者发生栓塞和持续性败血症的并发症较低,因此在部分患者中不进行抗凝治疗是合理的。建议进行系列影像学检查以监测血栓进展情况。