• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care.

作者信息

Jefford Michael, Tattersall Martin H N

机构信息

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2002 Oct;3(10):629-37. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00877-x.

DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00877-x
PMID:12372725
Abstract

Doctors have long feared that disclosure of a cancer diagnosis may harm the patient. However, the vast majority of cancer patients in more developed countries prefer to have as much information as possible, regardless of whether it is good or bad. Moreover, these patients are often dissatisfied with the amount and quality of information they receive. Additionally, many patients are unable to participate to the extent that they wish in decisions about their own care, and doctors frequently fail to recognise or appreciate the role that their patients prefer in decision-making. Various information resources have been developed to meet the needs of patients and their families. This paper discusses the information needs and participation preferences of patients with cancer and the consequences of not meeting these expectations. The paper then reviews the types of information resources that have been developed focusing on their reported effectiveness. The review concludes with suggestions for future research.

摘要

相似文献

1
Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care.
Lancet Oncol. 2002 Oct;3(10):629-37. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00877-x.
2
Informing, communicating and sharing decisions with people who have cancer.向癌症患者提供信息、进行沟通并分享治疗决策。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):193-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100193...
3
Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients.住院成年癌症患者的信息及决策偏好
Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(11):1139-45. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90343-7.
4
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].[共同决策:增强患者参与康复的一种方法]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097.
5
[Citizens' participation in health: education and shared decision-making. SESPAS Report 2012].[公民参与健康:教育与共同决策。西班牙公共卫生与社会医学研究所2012年报告]
Gac Sanit. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:158-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.10.005. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
6
Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.对信息的需求及参与治疗决策的情况:老年癌症患者的偏好及其医生的认知
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5275-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922.
7
Patient centered decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a world of paradoxes.姑息性癌症治疗中以患者为中心的决策:一个充满矛盾的世界。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 May;50(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00079-x.
8
Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients.瑞典乳腺癌患者参与治疗决策的信息需求与偏好
Acta Oncol. 2000;39(4):467-76. doi: 10.1080/028418600750013375.
9
Information and decision-making preferences of men with prostate cancer.前列腺癌男性的信息及决策偏好
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Oct;22(9):1401-8.
10
Internet use leads cancer patients to be active health care consumers.互联网使用使癌症患者成为积极的医疗保健消费者。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81 Suppl(0):S63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.004.

引用本文的文献

1
A feasibility study of scheduling a remission consultation in the management of patients treated for localized breast cancer.局部乳腺癌患者治疗中缓解期咨询安排的可行性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Sep 29;13(1):1087. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03393-6.
2
The association of appointment type in healthcare with patient reported experience measures: a population-based survey study.医疗保健中预约类型与患者报告的体验指标之间的关联:一项基于人群的调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 20;25(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12869-5.
3
Exploratory analysis of factors influencing hospital preferences among the Lebanese population: a cross-sectional study.
黎巴嫩人口中影响医院偏好的因素的探索性分析:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 12;14(11):e085727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085727.
4
Exploring Men's Experiences with Follow-Up Care following Primary Treatment for Prostate Cancer in Atlantic Canada: A Qualitative Study.探索加拿大大西洋地区男性在前列腺癌初级治疗后接受随访护理的体验:一项定性研究。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 25;30(12):10111-10123. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120735.
5
"There could be something going wrong and I wouldn't even know": a qualitative study of perceptions of people with cancer about cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and its management.“可能出了什么问题,但我甚至都不知道”:一项关于癌症患者对心血管疾病(CVD)风险及其管理认知的定性研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb;19(1):319-325. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01468-0. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
6
Cancer survivorship programs for patients from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds: a scoping review.癌症康复计划服务于具有不同文化和语言背景(CALD)的患者:范围综述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Dec;18(6):2052-2077. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01442-w. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
7
[Patient events in German urology: trend towards hybrid formats?].[德国泌尿外科的患者事件:向混合模式发展的趋势?]
Urologie. 2024 Jan;63(1):75-82. doi: 10.1007/s00120-023-02162-w. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
8
Access for Cancer Caregivers to Education and Support for Shared Decision Making (ACCESS) intervention: a cluster cross-over randomised clinical trial.癌症护理人员参与共同决策的教育与支持(ACCESS)干预措施:一项整群交叉随机临床试验。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 2. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004100.
9
Digital Trends, Digital Literacy, and E-Health Engagement Predictors of Breast and Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.数字趋势、数字素养和电子健康参与度对乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者的预测:一项基于人群的横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1472. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021472.
10
Evaluation of the quality and accuracy of breast cancer knowledge among persian language websites.评估波斯语网站中乳腺癌知识的质量和准确性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):1560. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08966-4.