• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Informing, communicating and sharing decisions with people who have cancer.

作者信息

Sowden A J, Forbes C, Entwistle V, Watt I

机构信息

NHS Centre for Reviews & Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):193-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100193...

DOI:10.1136/qhc.0100193..
PMID:11533427
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1743426/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Informing, communicating and sharing decisions with people who have cancer.向癌症患者提供信息、进行沟通并分享治疗决策。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):193-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100193...
2
On the evidence. Patient information.基于证据。患者信息。
Health Serv J. 2001 Mar 1;111(5744):36-7.
3
Communication skills: myths, realities, and new developments.沟通技巧：误区、现实与新进展
J Support Oncol. 2003 Sep-Oct;1(3):169-71.
4
Physician-patient communication in phase I cancer trials.癌症I期试验中的医患沟通。
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 1;22(3):571-2; author reply 572-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.99.229.
5
[Well-informed decision-making in cancer].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2018 Jun 7;162:D2803.
6
Straight talking about cancer. Duty or danger?直言癌症：职责还是风险？
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Feb 20;809:367-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48100.x.
7
Communication with cancer patients in culturally diverse societies.在文化多元的社会中与癌症患者沟通。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Feb 20;809:317-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48095.x.
8
Informing cancer patients: whose truth matters?告知癌症患者：谁的真相重要？
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Feb 20;809:508-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48113.x.
9
[White lie--is it still necessary in communication with cancer patients?].善意的谎言——在与癌症患者沟通中仍有必要吗？
Vopr Onkol. 2008;54(6):771-4.
10
Ethics of relationship. From communication to conversation.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Feb 20;809:400-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48103.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a cancer risk assessment tool (QCancer) in primary care: a qualitative study.在基层医疗中实施癌症风险评估工具（QCancer）的障碍和促进因素：一项定性研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Oct 7;22:e51. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000281.
2
Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: Qualitative study with service users and practitioners.在使用癌症风险评估工具时，在初级保健咨询中交流癌症风险：对服务使用者和从业者的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):509-518. doi: 10.1111/hex.13016. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
3
A Review of Decision Aids for Patients Considering More Than One Type of Invasive Treatment.考虑多种侵袭性治疗的患者的决策辅助工具综述。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:350-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
4
The Impact of Educational Status on the Postoperative Perception of Pain.教育程度对术后疼痛感知的影响。
Korean J Pain. 2015 Oct;28(4):265-74. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.4.265. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
5
Psychosocial Information Requirements for Multimorbid Breast Cancer Patients in Breast Centres in North Rhine Westphalia.北莱茵-威斯特法伦州乳腺癌中心多病症乳腺癌患者的心理社会信息需求
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Jul;75(7):702-709. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546271.
6
Colorectal cancer patients' attitudes towards involvement in decision making.结直肠癌患者对参与决策的态度。
Health Expect. 2009 Mar;12(1):27-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00515.x.
7
Cancer rehabilitation: psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital?癌症康复：出院后的心理社会康复需求？
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(4):216-21. doi: 10.1080/02813430802295610.
8
Service user experiences of information delivery after a diagnosis of cancer: a qualitative study.癌症诊断后服务使用者的信息传递体验：一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Aug;16(8):963-73. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0363-3. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
9
Preliminary testing of a just-in-time, user-defined values clarification exercise to aid lower literate women in making informed breast cancer treatment decisions.对一种即时的、用户定义的价值观澄清练习进行初步测试，以帮助低文化水平的女性做出明智的乳腺癌治疗决策。
Health Expect. 2006 Sep;9(3):218-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00386.x.
10
Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions.治疗决策辅助工具：概念问题与未来方向。
Health Expect. 2005 Jun;8(2):114-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00325.x.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of health professionals in informing cancer patients: findings from The Teamwork Project (phase one).医疗专业人员在告知癌症患者方面的作用：团队合作项目（第一阶段）的研究结果
Health Expect. 2000 Sep;3(3):217-219. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00105.x.
2
Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.在日常实践中实施共同决策：障碍与机遇
Health Expect. 2000 Sep;3(3):182-191. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00093.x.
3
Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.
Med Decis Making. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):1-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100101.
4
Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres.癌症患者的信息需求：英国癌症中心一项大型研究的结果
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jan 5;84(1):48-51. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1573.
5
Evaluation of communication training programs in nursing care: a review of the literature.
Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Jan;39(1):129-45. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00096-8.
6
Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications.为考虑影响癌症预后的治疗方案的患者提供的决策辅助工具：疗效证据及政策影响
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999(25):67-80. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024212.
7
Feasibility and effects of decision aids.决策辅助工具的可行性与效果
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):112-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000114.
8
Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients.针对癌症患者的个性化计算机信息随机试验。
BMJ. 1999 Nov 6;319(7219):1241-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1241.
9
What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?在做出治疗决策时，我们所说的伙伴关系是什么意思？
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):780-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.780.
10
Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars.迈向可行的共同决策模型：针对全科医学住院医师的焦点小组研究
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):753-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.753.