Sugahara Takeshi, Korogi Yukunori, Nakashima Kouji, Hamatake Satoshi, Honda Shin, Takahashi Mutsumasa
Department of Radiology, Health and Welfare Hospital, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Oct;23(9):1545-52.
Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is considered the criterion standard for depiction of intracranial aneurysms, it is often difficult to determine the relationship of overlapping vessels to aneurysms when using 2D DSA. We compared 2D and 3D DSA in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.
Thirty-six consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms underwent 2D and 3D DSA. After standard 2D DSA, rotational DSA was performed. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) and shaded surface display (SSD) images were created from the rotational DSA data sets. All images were assessed randomly for overall image quality, presence of aneurysm, presence of aneurysmal lobulation, visualization of aneurysmal neck, and relationship to adjacent vessels. Data analysis was conducted for 40 aneurysms treated by clip placement.
One aneurysm that was not detected at 2D DSA was classified as uncertain on the basis of rotational DSA. All aneurysms were classified as probably or definitively present on the basis of MIP and SSD findings. Overall image quality of rotational DSA, MIP, and SSD was statistically inferior to that of the standard 2D DSA for visualization of distal arteries. However, MIP and SSD images were significantly superior to those of standard 2D DSA for all other evaluations. For detection of lobulation, SSD images were significantly superior to other images, and for visualization of aneurysmal neck and relationship to neighboring arteries, SSD images were significantly superior to those of rotational DSA. For evaluation of the relationship to neighboring arteries, MIP images were significantly superior to those of rotational DSA.
Three-dimensional DSA, especially SSD, provided more detailed information for evaluating cerebral aneurysms than did standard 2D and rotational DSA.
尽管数字减影血管造影(DSA)被认为是颅内动脉瘤成像的标准方法,但使用二维DSA时,往往难以确定重叠血管与动脉瘤的关系。我们比较了二维和三维DSA在评估颅内动脉瘤方面的差异。
36例连续性脑动脉瘤患者接受了二维和三维DSA检查。在标准二维DSA检查后,进行旋转DSA检查。从旋转DSA数据集中生成最大密度投影(MIP)和表面阴影显示(SSD)图像。对所有图像随机评估其整体图像质量、动脉瘤的存在、动脉瘤分叶的存在、瘤颈的显示以及与相邻血管的关系。对40例接受夹闭治疗的动脉瘤进行数据分析。
1例在二维DSA中未检测到的动脉瘤,基于旋转DSA被分类为不确定。根据MIP和SSD的结果,所有动脉瘤均被分类为可能或肯定存在。对于远端动脉的显示,旋转DSA、MIP和SSD的整体图像质量在统计学上低于标准二维DSA。然而,在所有其他评估中,MIP和SSD图像明显优于标准二维DSA图像。对于分叶的检测,SSD图像明显优于其他图像;对于瘤颈的显示以及与邻近动脉的关系,SSD图像明显优于旋转DSA图像。对于与邻近动脉关系的评估,MIP图像明显优于旋转DSA图像。
三维DSA,尤其是SSD,在评估脑动脉瘤方面比标准二维和旋转DSA提供了更详细的信息。