El-Serag Hashem B, Graham David Y, Richardson Peter, Inadomi John M
Health Services Research Sections, Houston Center for Quality of Care & Utilization Studies, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14;162(18):2105-10. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.18.2105.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with an increased risk of clinical upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI) events, namely, symptomatic ulcer, perforation, bleeding, and obstruction. Our objective in this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of several strategies aimed at reducing the risk of clinical UGI events in NSAID users.
A decision tree model was used for patients requiring long-term treatment with NSAIDs to compare conventional NSAID therapy alone with 7 other treatment strategies to reduce the risk of NSAID-related clinical UGI events (cotherapy with proton-pump inhibitor, cotherapy with misoprostol, cyclooxygenase [COX]-2-selective NSAID therapy, or Helicobacter pylori treatment followed by each of the previous strategies, including conventional NSAID treatment, respectively). The outcome measure is the incremental cost per clinical UGI event prevented compared with conventional NSAID treatment over 1 year.
The use of a COX-2-selective NSAID and cotherapy with proton-pump inhibitors were the 2 most cost-effective strategies. However, the incremental cost associated with these strategies was high (>$35 000) in persons with a low risk of clinical UGI event with conventional NSAIDs (eg, 2.5% per year). If the baseline risk of clinical UGI events is moderately high (eg, 6.5%), using a COX-2-selective NSAID becomes the most effective and least costly (dominant) treatment strategy, followed closely by cotherapy with a daily proton-pump inhibitor. Because small changes in costs or assumed efficacy of these drugs could change the conclusions, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between any 2 strategies were presented in a nomogram that allows the flexible use of a wide range of values for costs and rates of clinical UGI events.
The risk of clinical UGI events in NSAID users depends on their baseline risk, the added risk associated with the individual NSAID, and the protection conferred by cotherapy. A nomogram can be used to incorporate these factors and derive estimates regarding cost-effectiveness of competing strategies aimed at reducing the risk of clinical UGI events.
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与临床中上消化道(UGI)事件风险增加相关,这些事件包括有症状的溃疡、穿孔、出血和梗阻。本研究的目的是比较几种旨在降低NSAIDs使用者临床UGI事件风险的策略的成本效益。
采用决策树模型,针对需要长期使用NSAIDs治疗的患者,将单纯常规NSAIDs治疗与其他7种治疗策略进行比较,以降低与NSAIDs相关的临床UGI事件风险(分别与质子泵抑制剂联合治疗、与米索前列醇联合治疗、环氧化酶[COX]-2选择性NSAIDs治疗,或幽门螺杆菌治疗后再采用上述每种策略,包括常规NSAIDs治疗)。结局指标是与常规NSAIDs治疗相比,1年内每预防1例临床UGI事件的增量成本。
使用COX-2选择性NSAIDs和与质子泵抑制剂联合治疗是两种最具成本效益的策略。然而,在使用常规NSAIDs发生临床UGI事件风险较低的人群(例如每年2.5%)中,与这些策略相关的增量成本较高(>35000美元)。如果临床UGI事件的基线风险中度较高(例如6.5%),使用COX-2选择性NSAIDs将成为最有效且成本最低(占优)的治疗策略,紧随其后的是每日与质子泵抑制剂联合治疗。由于这些药物成本或假定疗效的微小变化可能会改变结论,因此在列线图中呈现了任意两种策略之间的增量成本效益比,该列线图允许灵活使用广泛的成本值和临床UGI事件发生率。
NSAIDs使用者发生临床UGI事件的风险取决于其基线风险、与个体NSAIDs相关的附加风险以及联合治疗所提供的保护作用。列线图可用于纳入这些因素,并得出关于旨在降低临床UGI事件风险的竞争策略成本效益的估计值。