Suppr超能文献

基于门诊实践的甲癣确诊:一项美国全国性前瞻性调查。

Office practice-based confirmation of onychomycosis: a US nationwide prospective survey.

作者信息

Elewski Boni E, Leyden James, Rinaldi Michael G, Atillasoy Ercem

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14;162(18):2133-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.18.2133.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is sufficiently prevalent to be seen and treated by primary care physicians. The diagnosis of onychomycosis is most often confirmed from nail specimens by microscopy and fungal culture done at a central laboratory; these are relatively expensive tests with a turnaround time of a month or more. This study was conducted (1) to evaluate the use of in-office dermatophyte test medium (DTM) culture, and (2) to determine the epidemiology of onychomycosis in a large, nationwide sample of patients who were not participants in a clinical trial.

METHODS

A nationwide sample of primary care physicians and podiatrists enrolled 670 patients with clinical signs of toenail onychomycosis. Dermatophyte test medium cultures were performed in the office and the results were compared with fungal cultures performed by a central laboratory.

RESULTS

Central laboratory fungal cultures were positive in 44% (n = 297) of patients and DTM cultures in 51% (n = 345). Dermatophytes accounted for 93% of the confirmed infections and nondermatophyte molds the rest. In the 617 patients with paired dermatophyte test medium and laboratory fungal culture results, the 2 tests were in agreement (both positive or both negative) in 68% of cases (kappa, 0.37; asymptotic SE, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.299-0.441).

CONCLUSIONS

A DTM culture is a relatively rapid, easy, and inexpensive method to confirm dermatophyte infections in patients with signs of onychomycosis in the primary care setting. Because the available drugs for treating onychomycosis are effective against all dermatophyte species, the confirmation of dermatophyte infection, without further identification of genus and species, is sufficient evidence to begin treatment.

摘要

背景

甲癣发病率较高,基层医疗医生常可见到并进行治疗。甲癣的诊断通常通过在中央实验室对指甲标本进行显微镜检查和真菌培养来确诊;这些检查相对昂贵,周转时间长达一个月或更长时间。本研究旨在(1)评估门诊使用皮肤癣菌测试培养基(DTM)培养的情况,以及(2)确定在未参与临床试验的全国范围内的大量患者样本中甲癣的流行病学情况。

方法

全国范围内的基层医疗医生和足病医生招募了670例有趾甲甲癣临床症状的患者。在门诊进行皮肤癣菌测试培养基培养,并将结果与中央实验室进行的真菌培养结果进行比较。

结果

中央实验室真菌培养在44%(n = 297)的患者中呈阳性,DTM培养在51%(n = 345)的患者中呈阳性。确诊感染中皮肤癣菌占93%,其余为非皮肤癣菌霉菌。在617例有配对的皮肤癣菌测试培养基和实验室真菌培养结果的患者中,两种检测结果一致(均为阳性或均为阴性)的病例占68%(kappa值为0.37;渐近标准误为0.04;95%置信区间为0.299 - 0.441)。

结论

DTM培养是在基层医疗环境中确诊有甲癣症状患者皮肤癣菌感染的一种相对快速、简便且廉价的方法。由于现有的治疗甲癣的药物对所有皮肤癣菌种类均有效,因此确诊皮肤癣菌感染,无需进一步鉴定属和种,就足以作为开始治疗的依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验