• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌第三磨牙拔牙位点植骨:生物活性玻璃与未植骨位点的比较。

Grafting mandibular third molar extraction sites: a comparison of bioactive glass to a nongrafted site.

作者信息

Throndson Roger R, Sexton S Barrett

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, TX 77555-0531, USA.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Oct;94(4):413-9. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.127582.

DOI:10.1067/moe.2002.127582
PMID:12374912
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bioactive glass used as a graft material for regeneration of bone after the removal of impacted third molars. The healing distal to the second molars was followed, with documentation of the level of radiographic osseous fill and measurement of the changes in clinical attachment levels.

METHODS

Fourteen (5 male and 9 female) patients completed the study at 1 year. After surgical removal of bilateral impacted third molars, one site was grafted with bioactive glass particles (BioGran, Orthovita, Malvern, Penn). The patients were followed up at 1 and 2 weeks after surgery for signs or symptoms of infection or any other complications that may have been related to the surgical procedures. At 3, 6, and 12 months, the clinical attachment levels distal to the second molars were assessed. At 6 and 12 months, radiographs were obtained to assess the amount of osseous fill distal to the second molars.

RESULTS

A split-mouth design was used to test the efficacy of the grafting materials. Clinical attachment levels in the grafted sites were significantly higher than in the nongrafted sites. There was not a significant increase in bone formation when comparing the 2 sides at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that treatment of third molar extraction sites with bioactive glass does significantly alter the clinical attachment level but not the level of osseous fill distal to the second molars after 1 year.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估生物活性玻璃作为移植材料用于拔除阻生第三磨牙后骨再生的有效性。对第二磨牙远中侧的愈合情况进行跟踪,记录影像学骨填充水平并测量临床附着水平的变化。

方法

14名患者(5名男性和9名女性)在1年后完成了该研究。在手术拔除双侧阻生第三磨牙后,一个部位植入生物活性玻璃颗粒(BioGran,Orthovita,马尔文,宾夕法尼亚州)。在术后1周和2周对患者进行随访,观察是否有感染迹象或症状或任何可能与手术操作相关的其他并发症。在3个月、6个月和12个月时,评估第二磨牙远中侧的临床附着水平。在6个月和12个月时,拍摄X线片以评估第二磨牙远中侧的骨填充量。

结果

采用双侧对照设计来测试移植材料的疗效。植入部位的临床附着水平显著高于未植入部位。1年后比较两侧时,骨形成没有显著增加。

结论

本研究表明用生物活性玻璃治疗第三磨牙拔除部位确实会显著改变临床附着水平,但1年后不会改变第二磨牙远中侧的骨填充水平。

相似文献

1
Grafting mandibular third molar extraction sites: a comparison of bioactive glass to a nongrafted site.下颌第三磨牙拔牙位点植骨:生物活性玻璃与未植骨位点的比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Oct;94(4):413-9. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.127582.
2
Does grafting of third molar extraction sockets enhance periodontal measures in 30- to 35-year-old patients?在30至35岁患者中,第三磨牙拔牙窝植骨是否能改善牙周指标?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):757-64. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
3
Surgical extraction of deeply horizontally impacted mandibular second and third molars.下颌第二和第三磨牙深度水平阻生的外科拔除术。
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Mar;21(2):403-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cfa744.
4
The efficiency of two different synthetic bone graft materials on alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a split-mouth study.两种不同合成骨移植材料在拔牙后牙槽嵴保存中的效率:一项分侧研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04803-8.
5
Influence of immediate post-extraction socket irrigation on development of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar removal: a prospective split-mouth study, preliminary report.即刻拔牙窝冲洗对下颌第三磨牙拔除后牙槽突炎发展的影响:一项前瞻性分牙窝对照研究,初步报告。
Br Dent J. 2012 Dec;213(12):597-601. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.1134.
6
Composite bone graft for treatment of osseous defects after surgical removal of impacted third and second molars: case report and review of the literature.复合骨移植治疗阻生第三磨牙和第二磨牙拔除术后骨缺损:病例报告及文献综述
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):e8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
7
Comparative radiographic evaluation of alveolar bone healing associated with autologous platelet-rich plasma after impacted mandibular third molar surgery.下颌阻生第三磨牙手术后与自体富血小板血浆相关的牙槽骨愈合的比较影像学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jan;70(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.028. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
8
Autogenous Dentin Grafting of Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molars After Extraction of Impacted Third Molars.阻生第三磨牙拔除后下颌第二磨牙远中骨缺损的自体牙本质移植
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2020 Feb;41(2):76-82; quiz 83.
9
Prevention of mandibular third molar extraction-associated periodontal defects: a comparative study.下颌第三磨牙拔除相关牙周缺损的预防:一项比较研究。
J Periodontol. 2009 Mar;80(3):389-96. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080503.
10
Autogenous bone grafting for treatment of osseous defect after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: A randomized controlled trial.自体骨移植治疗下颌第三磨牙阻生拔除后骨缺损的随机对照研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Jun;19(3):572-580. doi: 10.1111/cid.12466. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical, tomographic, and histological analysis of post-extraction dental sockets filled with particulate dentin or blood clot: pilot study of a randomized clinical trial.对填充有颗粒状牙本质或血凝块的拔牙后牙槽窝进行临床、断层扫描和组织学分析:一项随机临床试验的初步研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 May 17;29(6):300. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06374-6.
2
Comparison of immediate vs. delayed guided tissue regeneration in Infrabony defect of second molars after adjacent third molar extraction: a retrospective study.相邻第三磨牙拔除后第二磨牙骨下袋缺损即刻与延迟引导组织再生的比较:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04591-1.
3
Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing.
第三磨牙冠向切除术与第二磨牙区牙周愈合时的完全拔除术比较。
Int Dent J. 2024 Apr;74(2):246-252. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.08.006. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
4
The use of autogenous tooth bone graft powder in the treatment of osseous defects after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: a prospective split-mouth clinical pilot study.自体牙骨移植粉在治疗下颌第三磨牙阻生拔除后骨缺损中的应用:一项前瞻性分牙位临床初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 2;22(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02473-y.
5
A Pilot Retrospective Study on the Effect of Bone Grafting after Wisdom Teeth Extraction.一项关于智齿拔除术后植骨效果的前瞻性回顾性研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 26;14(11):2844. doi: 10.3390/ma14112844.
6
Acemannan-induced tooth socket healing: A 12-month randomized controlled trial.乙酰甘露聚糖诱导的牙槽窝愈合:一项为期12个月的随机对照试验。
J Dent Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):643-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
Effects of Impacted Lower Third Molar Extraction on Periodontal Tissue of the Adjacent Second Molar.下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除对相邻第二磨牙牙周组织的影响。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021 Mar 22;17:235-247. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S298147. eCollection 2021.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of xenograft to prevent periodontal defects after mandibular third molar extraction.异体骨移植预防下颌第三磨牙拔除后牙周缺损的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Jul 1;26(4):e414-e421. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24260.
9
Role of p53 deficiency in socket healing after tooth extractions.p53 缺失在拔牙后牙槽窝愈合中的作用。
J Mol Histol. 2020 Feb;51(1):55-65. doi: 10.1007/s10735-020-09856-x. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
10
Tomographic late evaluation of xenogeneic bone grafts in sockets of impacted third molars.埋伏阻生第三磨牙拔牙窝内异种骨移植的断层扫描晚期评估
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 Jul 16;26:e20170396. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0396.