Aggarwal Ashutosh N, Gupta Dheeraj, Kumar Vijay, Jindal Surinder K
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
J Asthma. 2002 Sep;39(6):487-91. doi: 10.1081/jas-120004911.
Five daily readings of peak expiratory flow (PEF) were obtained for three days on 100 patients with chronic stable asthma. The variability of PEF was calculated as the amplitude percent mean (A%M) from the readings obtained on the third day, and compared to previously reported data from 152 healthy Indian adults. Patients with severe asthma exhibited significantly higher A%M than patients with both mild and moderate asthma (p < 0.05), but there was considerable overlap across disease categories. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve plotted to assess the performance of PEF variability as a discriminator in diagnosing asthma was 0.826, with best discrimination at a value of 12.5 (sensitivity 0.640, specificity 0.941). Using a cut-off value of 16.5 (as proposed earlier by us) improved specificity to 0.987 but reduced sensitivity to 0.510. Using a traditional cut-off of 20, specificity remained almost unchanged (0.993), but sensitivity dropped further to 0.440. Thus A%M>16.5 is a useful marker of bronchial asthma in epidemiological studies in India. However, its use in population screening, clinical diagnosis, or in the assessment of the severity of asthma in individual patients has serious limitations because of poor sensitivity.
对100例慢性稳定期哮喘患者进行了为期三天的每日5次呼气峰值流速(PEF)测量。根据第三天测得的数据计算PEF变异性,以平均幅度百分比(A%M)表示,并与之前报道的152名健康印度成年人的数据进行比较。重度哮喘患者的A%M显著高于轻度和中度哮喘患者(p<0.05),但不同疾病类别之间存在相当大的重叠。绘制受试者工作特征曲线下面积以评估PEF变异性作为哮喘诊断鉴别指标的性能,其值为0.826,在值为12.5时鉴别效果最佳(敏感性0.640,特异性0.941)。使用16.5的临界值(如我们之前所建议)可将特异性提高到0.987,但敏感性降至0.510。使用20的传统临界值,特异性几乎保持不变(0.993),但敏感性进一步降至0.440。因此,在印度的流行病学研究中,A%M>16.5是支气管哮喘的一个有用指标。然而,由于敏感性较差,其在人群筛查、临床诊断或个体患者哮喘严重程度评估中的应用存在严重局限性。