• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双重资格老年受益人的医疗保健满意度。

Satisfaction with health care of dually eligible older beneficiaries.

作者信息

Burton L C, Weiner J P, Folkemer J, Kasper J, German P S, Stevens G D

机构信息

Health Services Research and Development Center, John Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Summer;22(4):175-8.

PMID:12378765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4194736/
Abstract

Satisfaction with health care was compared for dually eligible older beneficiaries receiving care in three settings: a managed care organization (MCO) that is at risk for providing Medicare and Medicaid benefits (n = 200); the fee-for-service (FFS) sector in the same ZIP Code (n = 201); and respondents to the national Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) (n = 531). Patients in the MCO were more likely to be highly satisfied in three domains--global quality, access to care, and technical skills--compared with patients in the local and national FFS study groups but fewer were highly satisfied with the interpersonal manner of their providers.

摘要

研究比较了在三种环境中接受治疗的双重资格老年受益人的医疗保健满意度

一家承担医疗保险和医疗补助福利风险的管理式医疗组织(MCO)(n = 200);同一邮政编码区域的按服务收费(FFS)部门(n = 201);以及全国医疗保险当前受益人调查(MCBS)的受访者(n = 531)。与当地和全国FFS研究组的患者相比,MCO中的患者在三个方面更有可能高度满意——整体质量、获得医疗服务的机会和技术技能——但对其医疗服务提供者的人际沟通方式高度满意的患者较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2114/4194736/c7e1374ef6fb/hcfr-22-4-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2114/4194736/c7e1374ef6fb/hcfr-22-4-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2114/4194736/c7e1374ef6fb/hcfr-22-4-175-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Satisfaction with health care of dually eligible older beneficiaries.双重资格老年受益人的医疗保健满意度。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Summer;22(4):175-8.
2
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.传统医疗保险与管理式医疗保险绩效比较。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
3
Medicare beneficiaries rate their medical care: new data from the MCBS (Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey).医疗保险受益人对其医疗服务进行评级:来自医疗保险当前受益人调查(MCBS)的新数据。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):175-87.
4
HCFA plans huge Medicare patient survey.医疗保健财务管理局计划开展大规模的医疗保险患者调查。
Mod Healthc. 1996 Mar 18;26(12):21.
5
Effects of Integrating Care for Medicare-Medicaid Dually Eligible Seniors in Minnesota.明尼苏达州医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格老年人整合护理的效果。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):31-54. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1485396. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
6
Guideline recommendations for treatment of schizophrenia: the impact of managed care.精神分裂症治疗指南建议:管理式医疗的影响
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;60(4):340-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.4.340.
7
Medicare beneficiary complaints about quality of care.医疗保险受益人对医疗质量的投诉。
Am J Med Qual. 2000 Nov-Dec;15(6):241-50.
8
Evaluation of Medicaid managed care. Satisfaction, access, and use.医疗补助管理式医疗评估。满意度、可及性与使用情况。
JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):50-5.
9
Health outcomes and medicaid costs for frail older individuals: a case study of a MCO versus fee-for-service care.体弱老年人的健康结局与医疗补助成本:管理式医疗组织与按服务收费医疗的案例研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Feb;50(2):382-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50074.x.
10
By the numbers. Quality and satisfaction in Medicaid managed care.从数据看:医疗补助管理式医疗中的质量与满意度。
Healthplan. 1999 Jul-Aug;40(4):85-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Issues: Dually Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries, Challenges and Opportunities.研究问题:医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格受益人群体、挑战与机遇
Health Care Financ Rev. 1998 Winter;20(2):1-10.
2
MCBS Highlights: Dually Eligible Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险成本数据系统亮点:双重资格医疗保险受益人。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1998 Winter;20(2):131-140.
3
STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.老年人疾病研究。日常生活活动能力指数:生物和心理社会功能的标准化测量方法。
JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016.
4
Implementing the second generation social health maintenance organization.实施第二代社会健康维护组织。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Jul;48(7):829-34.
5
Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction among HMO enrollees.健康维护组织(HMO)参保者的社会经济地位与不满情绪
Med Care. 2000 May;38(5):508-16. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200005000-00007.
6
Use of preventive services by managed care enrollees: an updated perspective.管理式医疗参保者对预防性服务的使用:最新观点。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Jan-Feb;19(1):102-16. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.1.102.
7
A profile of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.医疗保险当前受益人调查概况。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1994 Summer;15(4):153-63.
8
Satisfaction with medical care among elderly people in fee-for-service care and an HMO.按服务收费医疗模式和健康维护组织下老年人对医疗护理的满意度。
J Aging Health. 1992 May;4(2):282-302. doi: 10.1177/089826439200400207.
9
Age and patterns of HMO satisfaction.健康维护组织(HMO)满意度的年龄及模式
J Aging Health. 1990 May;2(2):242-60. doi: 10.1177/089826439000200206.
10
Assessment of medical care by elderly people: general satisfaction and physician quality.老年人对医疗护理的评估:总体满意度与医生质量
Health Serv Res. 1998 Feb;32(6):741-58.