• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明尼苏达州医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格老年人整合护理的效果。

Effects of Integrating Care for Medicare-Medicaid Dually Eligible Seniors in Minnesota.

机构信息

Aging, Disability, and Long-Term Care Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Health Policy Center, Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):31-54. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1485396. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1080/08959420.2018.1485396
PMID:29979947
Abstract

Individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid often receive fragmented and inefficient care. Using Minnesota fee-for-service claims, managed care encounters, and enrollment data for 2010-2012, we estimated the likely impact of Minnesota Senior Health Option (MSHO)-seen as the first statewide fully integrated Medicare-Medicaid model-on health care and long-term services and supports use, relative to Minnesota Senior Care Plus (MSC+), a Medicaid-only managed care plan with Medicare fee for service. Estimates suggest that MSHO enrollees had significantly higher use of primary care and, potentially, of community-based services, combined with lower use of hospital-based care than similar MSC+ enrollees. Adopting fully integrated care models like MSHO may have merit in other states.

摘要

同时符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格的个人往往接受的是零散且效率低下的医疗服务。我们使用明尼苏达州的按服务收费索赔、管理式医疗遭遇和 2010-2012 年的参保数据,评估了明尼苏达州老年人健康选择(MSHO)——被视为首个全州范围内完全整合的医疗保险-医疗补助模式——对医疗保健和长期服务与支持使用的可能影响,相对于仅提供医疗补助管理式医疗计划的明尼苏达州老年人护理加(MSC+)。估计表明,MSHO 参保者的初级保健服务利用率明显更高,并且可能使用了更多的社区服务,同时比类似的 MSC+参保者的住院治疗利用率更低。在其他州采用完全整合的护理模式,如 MSHO,可能具有一定的优势。

相似文献

1
Effects of Integrating Care for Medicare-Medicaid Dually Eligible Seniors in Minnesota.明尼苏达州医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格老年人整合护理的效果。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):31-54. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1485396. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
2
Patterns of utilization for the Minnesota senior health options program.明尼苏达老年人健康选择计划的使用模式。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Dec;52(12):2039-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52558.x.
3
Satisfaction with health care of dually eligible older beneficiaries.双重资格老年受益人的医疗保健满意度。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Summer;22(4):175-8.
4
Selection bias and utilization of the dual eligibles in Medicare and Medicaid HMOs.医疗保险和医疗补助 HMO 中双重资格人群的选择偏倚和利用。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;43(5 Pt 1):1598-618. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00861.x. Epub 2008 May 13.
5
Differences in healthcare utilization between enrollees of fully integrated dual eligible special needs plans versus non-fully integrated plans.完全整合的双重资格特殊需要计划参保人与非完全整合计划参保人之间的医疗利用差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2027-2037. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18916. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
Strategies for integrating Medicare and Medicaid: design features and incentives.整合医疗保险和医疗补助的策略:设计特点与激励措施。
Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Jun;60(2):123-57. doi: 10.1177/1077558703060002001.
7
Capitated payment approaches for Medicaid-financed long-term care services.医疗补助计划资助的长期护理服务的按人头付费方式。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1999 Fall;21(1):51-64.
8
Minnesota pioneers dual-eligible managed care.
Contemp Longterm Care. 1998 Jan;21(1):32, 34.
9
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.传统医疗保险与管理式医疗保险绩效比较。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
10
The Minnesota Senior Health Options program: an early effort at integrating care for the dually eligible.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Sep;56(9):M559-66. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.9.m559.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicaid Spending in Coordination-Only Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.仅协调的双重资格特殊需求计划中的医疗补助支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55461.
2
Quality, Spending, Utilization, and Outcomes Among Dual-Eligible Medicare-Medicaid Beneficiaries in Integrated Care Programs: A Systematic Review.在整合照护计划中,双重资格的联邦医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(Medicare-Medicaid)受益人的质量、支出、利用率和结果:系统评价。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jul 5;5(7):e242187. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2187.
3
Changes in Care Associated With Integrating Medicare and Medicaid for Dual-Eligible Individuals.
医疗保险和医疗补助覆盖人群整合后相关护理的变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e234583. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4583.
4
Publicly Reported Quality Performance for Dual-eligible Special Needs Plans, 2010-2019.2010 - 2019年双重资格特殊需求计划的公开报告质量绩效
J Aging Soc Policy. 2023 Jun 22:1-21. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2226309.
5
Differences In Care Between Special Needs Plans And Other Medicare Coverage For Dual Eligibles.特殊需求计划与其他医疗保险覆盖的双重资格人群之间的护理差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1238-1247. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00463.
6
Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Mortality and Readmissions Among Older Adults Hospitalized for Pulmonary Embolism in the United States.美国因肺栓塞住院的老年患者中,社会经济地位不利与死亡率和再入院率的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e021117. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021117. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
7
Aligning Medicaid and Medicare Advantage Managed Care Plans for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries.使医疗补助和医疗保险优势管理式医疗计划与双重资格受益人保持一致。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):207-217. doi: 10.1177/10775587211018938. Epub 2021 Jun 2.