Schowen Richard L
Simons Laboratories, Higuchi Biosciences Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA.
J Immunol Methods. 2002 Nov 1;269(1-2):59-65. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(02)00224-7.
For the creation of powerfully catalytic antibodies, the technique of reactive immunization solves the problem inherent in immunization with transition-state analogs (TSAs), namely, that many interesting target reactions are multistep reactions, with multiple transition states, and thus in general, no single analog can adequately simulate all the transition states along the reaction path. In contrast, immunization with chemically reactive antigens such as phosphonylating agents, which phosphonylate B-cells during the immune response, produces antibodies that have been "trained" to recognize, bind, and stabilize all the actual transition states involved in the phosphonylation reaction. Therefore, catalytic antibodies have been selected by the immune system on the basis of their capacity to stabilize any number of transition states that occur during the target reaction. Somewhat surprisingly, phosphonolysis catalysts generated in this way commonly also catalyze esterolysis reactions. Esterolysis reactions should pass through transition states with a roughly tetrahedral disposition of ligands about a central carbon atom, while phosphonolysis reactions should pass through transition states with a roughly trigonal-bipyramidal disposition of ligands about a central phosphorus atom. These two divergent transition-state geometries suggest that the same active site should have difficulty recognizing and stabilizing both kinds of transition state. The observations thus indicate a puzzling form of "cross-reactivity" toward transition states. A possible explanation arises from evidence that at least some nucleophilic displacements at phosphorus do not pass through a trigonal-bipyramidal adduct, with a bond-formation transition state preceding it and a bond-fission transition state succeeding it. Instead a single transition state is traversed in which both bond-formation and bond-fission occur simultaneously. Such a concerted-reaction transition state should have two weak, partial bonds to phosphorus, one for formation of the nucleophile-P bond and one for fission of the P-leaving group bond. In a stepwise reaction through an intermediate, only one bond is partial and weak in each of the two transition states. The concerted-reaction transition state, with two weak bonds to phosphorus, may be more easily compressed, expanded, and otherwise distorted because of the lower force constants associated with partial bonds; particularly distortions of angles involving the two partial bonds should require relatively low energies. This may lend a high level of flexibility to phosphonolysis transition states, allowing them to be accommodated within an active site (or a range of active sites) with strong catalytic stabilization. Included among these active sites may be a majority that can also stabilize esterolysis transition states. Indeed many of the target esterolysis reactions studied to date may occur through a single concerted-reaction transition state rather than through separate transition states before and after a tetrahedral intermediate. Thus, the esterolysis transition states may also be highly flexible. Finally, flexibility present in germline antibodies may be specifically preserved in reactive immunization. The high flexibility of both kinds of ligands and of the antibody combining site may then account for the catalytic "cross-reactivity" of these antibodies.
为了制备具有强大催化活性的抗体,反应性免疫技术解决了用过渡态类似物(TSA)进行免疫时固有的问题,即许多有趣的靶反应是多步反应,具有多个过渡态,因此一般来说,没有单一的类似物能够充分模拟反应路径上的所有过渡态。相比之下,用化学反应性抗原如膦酰化剂进行免疫,膦酰化剂在免疫反应过程中使B细胞膦酰化,产生的抗体经过“训练”,能够识别、结合并稳定膦酰化反应中涉及的所有实际过渡态。因此,催化抗体是由免疫系统根据其稳定靶反应过程中出现的任意数量过渡态的能力选择出来的。有点令人惊讶的是,以这种方式产生的膦酰解催化剂通常也能催化酯解反应。酯解反应应该通过围绕中心碳原子的配体呈大致四面体排列的过渡态,而膦酰解反应应该通过围绕中心磷原子的配体呈大致三角双锥排列的过渡态。这两种不同的过渡态几何结构表明,同一个活性位点很难识别和稳定这两种过渡态。因此,这些观察结果表明了一种令人困惑的对过渡态的“交叉反应性”形式。一个可能的解释来自于这样的证据,即至少一些在磷上的亲核取代反应不经过三角双锥加合物,在其之前有一个键形成过渡态,在其之后有一个键断裂过渡态。相反,只经过一个单一的过渡态,其中键形成和键断裂同时发生。这样一个协同反应过渡态应该有两个与磷的弱的、部分键,一个用于形成亲核试剂 - 磷键,一个用于磷 - 离去基团键的断裂。在通过中间体的逐步反应中,在两个过渡态中的每一个中只有一个键是部分的和弱的。具有两个与磷的弱键的协同反应过渡态可能更容易被压缩、扩展以及以其他方式变形,因为与部分键相关的力常数较低;特别是涉及两个部分键的角度变形应该需要相对较低的能量。这可能赋予膦酰解过渡态高度的灵活性,使其能够在具有强大催化稳定性的活性位点(或一系列活性位点)内得到容纳。这些活性位点中可能包括大多数也能稳定酯解过渡态的位点。实际上,迄今为止研究的许多靶酯解反应可能通过单一的协同反应过渡态发生,而不是通过四面体中间体之前和之后的单独过渡态。因此,酯解过渡态也可能具有高度的灵活性。最后,种系抗体中存在的灵活性可能在反应性免疫中被特异性保留。两种配体以及抗体结合位点的高灵活性可能解释了这些抗体的催化“交叉反应性”。