Langman Rodney E, Cohn Melvin
Conceptual Immunology Group, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Cell Immunol. 2002 Mar-Apr;216(1-2):15-22. doi: 10.1016/s0008-8749(02)00503-8.
The evolution of the somatically generated random combining site repertoire of the "adaptive" immune system depended on the concurrent appearance of a somatic process that sorted the repertoire into anti-self and anti-nonself. Unlike the germline-selected sorting process characteristic of "innate" defense mechanisms, somatic sorting of the repertoire requires that antigens be classified based on their behavior, not on their physical or chemical properties. As specific recognitive combining sites (paratopes) define antigenic determinants (epitopes), the sorting of the repertoire operates epitope-by-epitope. By contrast, the coupling of the paratope to effector function must operate antigen-by-antigen because the response to each epitope on the antigen must be in the same effector class (i.e., coherent). This distinction resolves a long standing debate and provides a basis for analyzing the various models.
“适应性”免疫系统体细胞产生的随机组合位点库的进化依赖于一个体细胞过程的同时出现,该过程将库分类为抗自身和抗非自身。与“先天”防御机制特有的种系选择分类过程不同,库的体细胞分类要求根据抗原的行为而非其物理或化学性质对其进行分类。由于特异性识别结合位点(互补决定区)定义了抗原决定簇(表位),库的分类是逐个表位进行的。相比之下,互补决定区与效应器功能的偶联必须逐个抗原进行,因为对抗原上每个表位的反应必须属于同一效应器类别(即连贯的)。这一区别解决了长期以来的争论,并为分析各种模型提供了基础。